The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Remote patient monitoring using artificial intelligence: Current state, applications, and challenges
Open accessAbstract
The adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare is growing rapidly. Remote patient monitoring (RPM) is one of the common healthcare applications that assist doctors to monitor patients with chronic or acute illness at remote locations, elderly people in‐home care, and even hospitalized patients. The reliability of manual patient monitoring systems depends on staff time management which is dependent on their workload. Conventional patient monitoring involves invasive approaches which require skin contact to monitor health status. This study aims to do a comprehensive review of RPM systems including adopted advanced technologies, AI impact on RPM, challenges and trends in AI‐enabled RPM. This review explores the benefits and challenges of patient‐centric RPM architectures enabled with Internet of Things wearable devices and sensors using the cloud, fog, edge, and blockchain technologies. The role of AI in RPM ranges from physical activity classification to chronic disease monitoring and vital signs monitoring in emergency settings. This review results show that AI‐enabled RPM architectures have transformed healthcare monitoring applications because of their ability to detect early deterioration in patients' health, personalize individual patient health parameter monitoring using federated learning, and learn human behavior patterns using techniques such as reinforcement learning. This review discusses the challenges and trends to adopt AI to RPM systems and implementation issues. The future directions of AI in RPM applications are analyzed based on the challenges and trends. This article is categorized under: Application Areas > Health Care Technologies > Artificial Intelligence Technologies > Internet of Things
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 · Cited by 108,283
Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.
Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4 · Cited by 26,092
A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions
Lundberg, S., & Lee, S.-I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.07874 · Cited by 23,707
17. A Value for n-Person Games
Shapley, L. S. (1953) · Contributions to the Theory of Games (AM-28), Volume II · doi:10.1515/9781400881970-018 · Cited by 6,950
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J., Bossuyt, P., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T., mulrow, C., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J., Akl, E., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2020) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/v7gm2 · Cited by 5,177
A review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning: Techniques, applications and challenges
Abdar, M., Pourpanah, F., Hussain, S., Rezazadegan, D., Liu, L., Ghavamzadeh, M., Fieguth, P., Cao, X., Khosravi, A., Acharya, U. R., et al. (2021) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.05.008 · Cited by 3,111 · cited 1×
“Abdar et al. (2021) surveyed the research community's work on quantifying uncertainty in machine learning and deep learning models.”
BackgroundSelf-citationExplainable AI: a review of machine learning interpretability methods
Linardatos, P., Papastefanopoulos, V., & Kotsiantis, S. (2020) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e23010018 · Cited by 2,922
Nahum-Shani, I., Smith, S. N., Spring, B. J., Collins, L. M., Witkiewitz, K., Tewari, A., & Murphy, S. A. (2018) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-016-9830-8 · Cited by 2,171 · cited 1×
“This can be achieved by adaptive learning of dynamic health changes in a patient (Nahum-Shani et al., 2017).”
BackgroundAleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in machine learning: an introduction to concepts and methods
Hüllermeier, E., & Waegeman, W. (2021) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-021-05946-3 · Cited by 1,834 · cited 1×
“The former two uncertainties would lead to uncertainty in the modeling results can be split into data uncertainty (aleatoric uncertainty) and model uncertainty (epistemic uncertainty) (Hüllermeier & Waegeman, 2021).”
BackgroundWearable health devices-vital sign monitoring, systems and technologies
Dias, D., & Paulo Silva Cunha, J. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18082414 · Cited by 919
Cited by
Ethical and regulatory challenges of AI technologies in healthcare: A narrative review
Mennella, C., Maniscalco, U., De Pietro, G., & Esposito, M. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26297 · Cited by 1,229
A Review of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Al Kuwaiti, A., Nazer, K., Al-Reedy, A., Al-Shehri, S., Al-Muhanna, A., Subbarayalu, A. V., Al Muhanna, D., & Al-Muhanna, F. A. (2023) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm13060951 · Cited by 915
AI revolutionizing industries worldwide: A comprehensive overview of its diverse applications
Rashid, A. B., & Kausik, M. A. K. (2024) · Hybrid Advances · doi:10.1016/j.hybadv.2024.100277 · Cited by 764
A review of IoT applications in healthcare
Li, C., Wang, J., Wang, S., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2023.127017 · Cited by 369
Next-generation agentic AI for transforming healthcare
Karunanayake, N. (2025) · Informatics and Health · doi:10.1016/j.infoh.2025.03.001 · Cited by 165
Metadata
- Authors
- Shaik, T., Tao, X., Higgins, N., Li, L., Gururajan, R., Zhou, X., & Acharya, U. R.
- Venue
- WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-01-05
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1942-4787 (ISSN-L)
- 1942-4795
- OpenAlex
- W4313646859
- Cited by
- 515
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 121.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Remote patient monitoring using artificial intelligence: Current state, applications, and challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/widm.1485
- The paper
- Shaik, T., Tao, X., Higgins, N., Li, L., Gururajan, R., Zhou, X., & Acharya, U. R. (2023). Remote patient monitoring using artificial intelligence: Current state, applications, and challenges. WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1485
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
