The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Remote patient monitoring using artificial intelligence: Current state, applications, and challenges
Open accessAbstract
The adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare is growing rapidly. Remote patient monitoring (RPM) is one of the common healthcare applications that assist doctors to monitor patients with chronic or acute illness at remote locations, elderly people in‐home care, and even hospitalized patients. The reliability of manual patient monitoring systems depends on staff time management which is dependent on their workload. Conventional patient monitoring involves invasive approaches which require skin contact to monitor health status. This study aims to do a comprehensive review of RPM systems including adopted advanced technologies, AI impact on RPM, challenges and trends in AI‐enabled RPM. This review explores the benefits and challenges of patient‐centric RPM architectures enabled with Internet of Things wearable devices and sensors using the cloud, fog, edge, and blockchain technologies. The role of AI in RPM ranges from physical activity classification to chronic disease monitoring and vital signs monitoring in emergency settings. This review results show that AI‐enabled RPM architectures have transformed healthcare monitoring applications because of their ability to detect early deterioration in patients' health, personalize individual patient health parameter monitoring using federated learning, and learn human behavior patterns using techniques such as reinforcement learning. This review discusses the challenges and trends to adopt AI to RPM systems and implementation issues. The future directions of AI in RPM applications are analyzed based on the challenges and trends. This article is categorized under: Application Areas > Health Care Technologies > Artificial Intelligence Technologies > Internet of Things
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 · Cited by 108,283
Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.
Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4 · Cited by 26,092
A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions
Lundberg, S., & Lee, S.-I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.07874 · Cited by 23,707
17. A Value for n-Person Games
Shapley, L. S. (1953) · Contributions to the Theory of Games (AM-28), Volume II · doi:10.1515/9781400881970-018 · Cited by 6,950
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J., Bossuyt, P., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T., mulrow, C., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J., Akl, E., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2020) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/v7gm2 · Cited by 5,177
A review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning: Techniques, applications and challenges
Abdar, M., Pourpanah, F., Hussain, S., Rezazadegan, D., Liu, L., Ghavamzadeh, M., Fieguth, P., Cao, X., Khosravi, A., Acharya, U. R., et al. (2021) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.05.008 · Cited by 3,111 · cited 1×
“Abdar et al. (2021) surveyed the research community's work on quantifying uncertainty in machine learning and deep learning models.”
BackgroundSelf-citationExplainable AI: a review of machine learning interpretability methods
Linardatos, P., Papastefanopoulos, V., & Kotsiantis, S. (2020) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e23010018 · Cited by 2,922
Nahum-Shani, I., Smith, S. N., Spring, B. J., Collins, L. M., Witkiewitz, K., Tewari, A., & Murphy, S. A. (2018) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-016-9830-8 · Cited by 2,171 · cited 1×
“This can be achieved by adaptive learning of dynamic health changes in a patient (Nahum-Shani et al., 2017).”
BackgroundAleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in machine learning: an introduction to concepts and methods
Hüllermeier, E., & Waegeman, W. (2021) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-021-05946-3 · Cited by 1,834 · cited 1×
“The former two uncertainties would lead to uncertainty in the modeling results can be split into data uncertainty (aleatoric uncertainty) and model uncertainty (epistemic uncertainty) (Hüllermeier & Waegeman, 2021).”
BackgroundWearable health devices-vital sign monitoring, systems and technologies
Dias, D., & Paulo Silva Cunha, J. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18082414 · Cited by 919
Federated learning for smart healthcare: A survey
Nguyen, D. C., Pham, Q.-V., Pathirana, P. N., Ding, M., Seneviratne, A., Lin, Z., Dobre, O., & Hwang, W.-J. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3501296 · Cited by 827
Torous, J., Nicholas, J., Larsen, M. E., Firth, J., & Christensen, H. (2018) · Evidence Based Mental Health · doi:10.1136/eb-2018-102891 · Cited by 790
Artificial intelligence in medical practice: the question to the answer?
Miller, D. D., & Brown, E. W. (2018) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.10.035 · Cited by 774
Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition
Chen, K., Zhang, D., Yao, L., Guo, B., Yu, Z., & Liu, Y. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3447744 · Cited by 690 · cited 5×
“Feature extraction is one of the key steps RPM systems perform in analyzing human vital signs and activity recognition (K. Chen, Zhang, et al., 2021).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBini, S. A. (2018) · The Journal of Arthroplasty · doi:10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.067 · Cited by 670
The need for uncertainty quantification in machine-assisted medical decision making
Begoli, E., Bhattacharya, T., & Kusnezov, D. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-018-0004-1 · Cited by 597 · cited 1×
“Begoli et al. (2019) also discussed the need for UQ in machine learning-assisted medical decision-making.”
BackgroundRemote patient monitoring: a comprehensive study
Malasinghe, L. P., Ramzan, N., & Dahal, K. (2019) · Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing · doi:10.1007/s12652-017-0598-x · Cited by 534
Lauritsen, S. M., Kristensen, M., Olsen, M. V., Larsen, M. S., Lauritsen, K. M., Jørgensen, M. J., Lange, J., & Thiesson, B. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17431-x · Cited by 448
Thieme, A., Belgrave, D., & Doherty, G. (2020) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3398069 · Cited by 406
The clinical effectiveness of telehealth: A systematic review of meta-analyses from 2010 to 2019
Snoswell, C. L., Chelberg, G., De Guzman, K. R., Haydon, H. M., Thomas, E. E., Caffery, L. J., & Smith, A. C. (2023) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x211022907 · Cited by 397 · cited 1×
“In FIGURE 2 Study flow diagram PRISMA-ScR (Page et al., 2021) their study, Snoswell et al. (2021) reviewed 38 meta-analysis articles published between 2010 and 2019 and covered 10 medical disciplines including multidisciplinary care and other specialized disciplines like cardiovascular disease and…”
MethodFedHome: Cloud-Edge Based Personalized Federated Learning for In-Home Health Monitoring
Wu, Q., Chen, X., Zhou, Z., & Zhang, J. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/tmc.2020.3045266 · Cited by 392
Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunities
Chen, K., Zhang, D., Yao, L., Guo, B., Yu, Z., & Liu, Y. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.07416 · Cited by 314 · cited 5×
“Feature extraction is one of the key steps RPM systems perform in analyzing human vital signs and activity recognition (K. Chen, Zhang, et al., 2021).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA Survey on Bayesian Deep Learning
Wang, H., & Yeung, D.-Y. (2021) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3409383 · Cited by 247
A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networks
Gawlikowski, J., Tassi, C. R. N., Ali, M., Lee, J., Humt, M., Feng, J., Kruspe, A., Triebel, R., Jung, P., Roscher, R., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.03342 · Cited by 232
Learning representations for the early detection of sepsis with deep neural networks
Kam, H. J., & Kim, H. Y. (2017) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.08.015 · Cited by 218
Explainable decision forest: Transforming a decision forest into an interpretable tree
Sagi, O., & Rokach, L. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2020.03.013 · Cited by 189
Drake, C., Zhang, Y., Chaiyachati, K. H., & Polsky, D. (2019) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m19-0283 · Cited by 179
RAIM: Recurrent Attentive and Intensive Model of Multimodal Patient Monitoring Data
Xu, Y., Biswal, S., Deshpande, S. R., Maher, K. O., & Sun, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3219819.3220051 · Cited by 144
Coppock, H., Gaskell, A., Tzirakis, P., Baird, A., Jones, L., & Schuller, B. (2021) · BMJ Innovations · doi:10.1136/bmjinnov-2021-000668 · Cited by 108
Cited by
Ethical and regulatory challenges of AI technologies in healthcare: A narrative review
Mennella, C., Maniscalco, U., De Pietro, G., & Esposito, M. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26297 · Cited by 1,229
A Review of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Al Kuwaiti, A., Nazer, K., Al-Reedy, A., Al-Shehri, S., Al-Muhanna, A., Subbarayalu, A. V., Al Muhanna, D., & Al-Muhanna, F. A. (2023) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm13060951 · Cited by 915
AI revolutionizing industries worldwide: A comprehensive overview of its diverse applications
Rashid, A. B., & Kausik, M. A. K. (2024) · Hybrid Advances · doi:10.1016/j.hybadv.2024.100277 · Cited by 764
A review of IoT applications in healthcare
Li, C., Wang, J., Wang, S., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2023.127017 · Cited by 369
Next-generation agentic AI for transforming healthcare
Karunanayake, N. (2025) · Informatics and Health · doi:10.1016/j.infoh.2025.03.001 · Cited by 165
Metadata
- Authors
- Shaik, T., Tao, X., Higgins, N., Li, L., Gururajan, R., Zhou, X., & Acharya, U. R.
- Venue
- WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-01-05
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1942-4787 (ISSN-L)
- 1942-4795
- OpenAlex
- W4313646859
- Cited by
- 515
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 121.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.