Cited by 291Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyWorkplace Spirituality and LeadershipMental Health Treatment and Access

WPA Position Statement on Spirituality and Religion in Psychiatry

Open access
Moreira‐Almeida, Alexander, Sharma, Avdesh, van Rensburg, Bernard Janse, Verhagen, Peter J., Cook, Christopher C.H.·2016·World Psychiatry

Abstract

The WPA and the World Health Organization (WHO) have worked hard to assure that comprehensive mental health promotion and care are scientifically based and, at the same time, compassionate and culturally sensitive1, 2. In recent decades, there has been increasing public and academic awareness of the relevance of spirituality and religion to health issues. Systematic reviews of the academic literature have identified more than 3,000 empirical studies investigating the relationship between religion/spirituality (R/S) and health3, 4. In the field of mental disorders, it has been shown that R/S has significant implications for prevalence (especially depressive and substance use disorders), diagnosis (e.g., differentiation between spiritual experiences and mental disorders), treatment (e.g., help seeking behavior, compliance, mindfulness, complementary therapies), outcomes (e.g., recovering and suicide) and prevention, as well as for quality of life and wellbeing3, 4. The WHO has now included R/S as a dimension of quality of life5. Although there is evidence to show that R/S is usually associated with better health outcomes, it may also cause harm (e.g., treatment refusal, intolerance, negative religious coping). Surveys have shown that R/S values, beliefs and practices remain relevant to most of the world population and that patients would like to have their R/S concerns addressed in health care6-8. Psychiatrists need to take into account all factors impacting on mental health. Evidence shows that R/S should be included among these, irrespective of psychiatrists' spiritual, religious or philosophical orientation. However, few medical schools or specialist curricula provide any formal training for psychiatrists to learn about the evidence available, or how to properly address R/S in research and clinical practice7, 9. In order to fill this gap, the WPA and several national psychiatric associations (e.g., Brazil, India, South Africa, UK, and USA) have created sections on R/S. WPA has included "religion and spirituality" as a part of the "Core Training Curriculum for Psychiatry"10. Both terms, religion and spirituality, lack a universally agreed definition. Definitions of spirituality usually refer to a dimension of human experience related to the transcendent, the sacred, or to ultimate reality. Spirituality is closely related to values, meaning and purpose in life. Spirituality may develop individually or in communities and traditions. Religion is often seen as the institutional aspect of spirituality, usually defined more in terms of systems of beliefs and practices related to the sacred or divine, as held by a community or social group3, 8. Alexander Moreira-Almeida1,2, Avdesh Sharma1,3, Bernard Janse van Rensburg1,4, Peter J. Verhagen1,5, Christopher C.H. Cook1,6 1WPA Section on Religion, Spirituality and Psychiatry; 2Research Center in Spirituality and Health, School of Medicine, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil; 3'Parivartan' Center for Mental Health, New Delhi, India; 4Department of Psychiatry, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; 5GGZ Centraal, Harderwijk, the Netherlands; 6Department of Theology and Religion, Durham University, Durham, UK This document was proposed by the WPA Section on Religion, Spirituality and Psychiatry and approved by the WPA Executive Committee in September 2015. The authors thank all who contributed during the process of developing this position statement, and especially D. Bhugra, R. Cloninger, J. Cox, V. DeMarinis, J.J. Lopez-Ibor (in memoriam), D. Moussaoui, N. Nagy, A. Powell, and H.M. van Praag. This position statement has drawn on some of the text of recommendations already published in the Royal College of Psychiatrists position statement11.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wps.20304

Cites

10 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 1 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Bhugra D. World Psychiatry 2014;13:328.
  2. Saxena S, Funk M, Chisholm D. World Psychia- try 2014;13:107-9.
  3. WHOQOL SRPB Group. Soc Sci Med 2006;62: 1486-97.
  4. Pargament KI, Lomax JW. World Psychiatry 2013;12:26-32.
  5. Moreira-Almeida A, Koenig HG, Lucchetti G. Rev Bras Psiquiatr 2014;36:176-82.
  6. Cloninger CR. Mens Sana Monographs 2013; 11:16-24.
  7. Bhugra D. World Psychiatry 2014;13:328.
  8. Bhugra D. World Psychiatry 2015;14:254.
  9. Kallivayalil RA. World Psychiatry 2015;14:374-5.
  10. Javed A. World Psychiatry 2014;13:205.
  11. Javed A. World Psychiatry 2015;14:255-6.
  12. Riba M. World Psychiatry 2015;14:109-10.
  13. Saxena S, Funk M, Chisholm D. World Psychia- try 2014;13:107-9.
  14. First MB, Reed GM, Hyman SE et al. World Psychiatry 2015;14:82-90.
  15. Grant JE, Atmaca M, Fineberg NA et al. World Psychiatry 2014;13:125-7.
  16. Lochman JE, Evans SC, Burke JD et al. World Psychiatry 2015;14:30-3.
  17. Dawson KS, Bryant RA, Harper M et al. World Psychiatry 2015;14:354-7.
  18. First MB. World Psychiatry 2014;13:53-4.
  19. Wahlbeck K. World Psychiatry 2015;14:36-42.
  20. Caldas de Almeida JM. World Psychiatry 2015; 14:51-3.
  21. Del Vecchio V. World Psychiatry 2014;13:102-4.
  22. Luciano M. World Psychiatry 2014;13:206-8.
  23. Sampogna G. World Psychiatry 2015;14:110-2.
  24. Luciano M. World Psychiatry 2015;14:375-6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moreira‐Almeida, A., Sharma, A., van Rensburg, B. J., Verhagen, P. J., & Cook, C. C. H.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (BR)
  • Wisconsin Parkinson Association (US)
  • WPA Section on Religion, Spirituality and Psychiatry
  • GGz centraal (NL)
  • Durham University (GB)
Venue
World Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-02
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
87-88
ISSN
  • 1723-8617 (ISSN-L)
  • 2051-5545
OpenAlex
W2264092943
Cited by
291
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
29.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
World Health Organization
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
religion and spirituality, psychiatry, mental health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review