CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 104COVID-19 and Mental HealthMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumCommunication and COVID-19 Impact

The relevance of COVID‐19 pandemic to psychiatry

Open access
Marazziti, Donatella, Stahl, Stephen M.·2020·World Psychiatry
DOI 10.1002/wps.20764PMC PMC7215065
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has several aspects of psychiatric interest and relevance. It should be first noticed that a pandemic of such proportions was largely unexpected in Western countries, where people generally believe that modern health systems, available medications and healthy lifestyles should allow them to cope with any kind of aggressive agents. This event undermined the sense of safety of our societies, where progress is often considered relentless, life increasingly better and longer, epidemics just a waning memory of past centuries, and death is removed and generally considered a private event. The pandemic is promoting a mounting awareness of our intrinsic vulnerability. Indeed, the progression of the pandemic has been facilitated by one of the most salient characteristics of our societies: the interconnections between countries and the easiness to travel with affordable budgets. This means that there is no barrier that cannot be overcome or pierced, and that a total isolation is impossible. Ironically, isolation has become the most effective strategy to slow the progression of the pandemic, as demonstrated by the China experience. People have now to abruptly face significant changes in their everyday life, working models and social behaviours. It is not surprising that several individuals are showing acute fight-or-flight responses, such as increased anxiety levels, panic attacks, irrational fears up to paranoid-like convictions and related behaviours, or a quiet resignation1. Assaulting supermarkets to buy enormous amounts of food to be stored, like during war periods, as well as visceral reactions towards specific groups of people or individuals with symptoms of cold or cough, have become common during these months. At least at the beginning of the pandemic, these reactions have also been fuelled by the ambiguity of politicians, who on the one hand tried to reassure their communities, while on the other organized too weak or too stringent countermeasures to limit the progression of the infection, that were sometimes inappropriate and had to be corrected. Even worst, in some countries such as Italy, politicians of different parties expressed strong personal opinions, sometimes with no scientific background, or "used" the pandemic to criticize the government and/or increase their consensus. In addition, the information provided by the media has been in several cases catastrophic and sensational rather than prudent and accurate, and generally too insistent (taking an excessive number of hours in TV programming and of pages in newspapers daily). All these factors have been converging to increase people's sense of uncertainty and helplessness as well as distrust towards official information, while fuelling the conviction that nobody can do anything really effective to stop the pandemic. Psychiatrists, in this emergency, can potentially play key roles. First, they can support front-line physicians, nurses and all involved personnel by dealing with their fears and those of affected individuals. These professionals are too often burdened by the workload of these months, with the mounting risk of burnout syndromes, and are exposed to the constant threat of being themselves infected (more than 30,000 doctors have been infected in China and more than 30 died). Furthermore, in some countries, due to the shortage of the appropriate equipments, front-line physicians are increasingly being faced with the ethical dilemma of selecting the affected patients who can be treated optimally, a situation that is always a personal tragedy2. Second, psychiatrists will have to be ready to face not only the acute reactions to the pandemic, that generally are self-limiting, but also its long-term consequences. We do expect an epidemic of post-traumatic stress disorder and depressive syndromes, due to the convergence of a variety of factors, such as the experience of being infected or witnessing the infection and perhaps the death of dear ones, the drastic changes of lifestyles, quarantine, and the profound economic recession that many countries are going to face3, 4. In addition, we are well aware that all these factors may have a more significant impact on the most vulnerable subjects in our societies, among whom people with mental disorders are obviously included. We are already witnessing and should be prepared to increasingly see the incorporation of themes related to the infection into the fears and delusions of many of our patients. Only a correct scientific information coupled with the management of the emergency by a range of specialists, including psychiatrists, in connection with governmental (or, even better, supranational) agencies5, can be regarded as an appropriate strategy to enable people to cope with fears that are not unmotivated, but may be excessive and irrational6. If fear and anxiety are biologically rooted reactions that have promoted human survival and evolution,

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wps.20764

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Marazziti, D., & Stahl, S. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Pisa (IT)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
ORCID
Venue
World Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-05-11
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
261-261
ISSN
  • 1723-8617 (ISSN-L)
  • 2051-5545
DOI
10.1002/wps.20764
PMC
PMC7215065
OpenAlex
W3024583924
Cited by
104
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 8
FWCI
9.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • World Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, anxiety, panic attacks, paranoia, social isolation, fear of contagion, media sensationalism, mental health of healthcare workers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review