Cited by 86Genetic Syndromes and ImprintingRNA modifications and cancerChromosomal and Genetic Variations

Box C/D small nucleolar RNA genes and the Prader‐Willi syndrome: a complex interplay

Cavaillé, Jérôme·2017·WIREs RNA

Abstract

The nucleolus of mammalian cells contains hundreds of box C/D small nucleolar RNAs(SNORDs). Through their ability to base pair with ribosomal RNA precursors, most play important roles in the synthesis and/or activity of ribosomes, either by guiding sequence‐specific 2′‐O‐methylations or by facilitating RNA folding and cleavages. A growing number of SNORD genes with elusive functions have been discovered recently. Intriguingly, the vast majority of them are located in two large, imprinted gene clusters at human chromosome region 15q11q13 (theSNURF–SNRPNdomain) and at 14q32 (theDLK1–DIO3domain) where they are expressed, respectively, only from the paternally and maternally inherited alleles. These placental mammal‐specific SNORD genes have many features of the canonical SNORDs that guide 2′‐O‐methylations, yet they lack obvious complementarity with ribosomal RNAs and, surprisingly, they are processed from large, tandemly repeated genes expressed preferentially in the brain. This review summarizes our understanding of the biology of these peculiar SNORD genes, focusing particularly onSNORD115andSNORD116in theSNURF–SNRPNdomain. It examines the growing evidence that altered levels of these SNORDs and/or their host‐gene transcripts may be a primary cause of Prader‐Willi syndrome (PWS; a rare disorder characterized by overeating and obesity) as well as abnormalities in signaling through the 5‐HT2C serotonin receptor. Finally, the hypothesis that PWS may be a ribosomopathy (ribosomal disease) is also discussed.WIREs RNA 2017, 8:e1417. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1417 This article is categorized under:Translation > Ribosome Biogenesis RNA Processing > RNA Editing and Modification RNA in Disease and Development > RNA in Disease

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wrna.1417

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cavaillé, J.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Cavaillé, Jérôme
Venue
WIREs RNA
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-03-13
Volume
8
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 1757-7004 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-7012
OpenAlex
W2595692190
Cited by
86
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews - RNA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Foundation for Prader-Willi Research
  • Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (DEQ20160334936)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA modifications and cancer
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Keywords
Prader-Willi syndrome, genomic imprinting, Dlk1-Dio3 domain, SNORD116, 2'-O-methylation, ribosomopathies, obesity, chromosome 14q32, tandemly repeated genes
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Prader-Willi Syndrome, Genomic Imprinting, RNA, Small Nucleolar

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review