Cited by 353Biomedical Text Mining and OntologiesBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksSemantic Web and Ontologies

The mammalian phenotype ontology: enabling robust annotation and comparative analysis

Open access
Smith, Cynthia L., Eppig, Janan T.·2009·WIREs Systems Biology and Medicine

Abstract

The mouse has long been an important model for the study of human genetic disease. Through the application of genetic engineering and mutagenesis techniques, the number of unique mutant mouse models and the amount of phenotypic data describing them are growing exponentially. Describing phenotypes of mutant mice in a computationally useful manner that will facilitate data mining is a major challenge for bioinformatics. Here we describe a tool, the Mammalian Phenotype Ontology (MP), for classifying and organizing phenotypic information related to the mouse and other mammalian species. The MP Ontology has been applied to mouse phenotype descriptions in the Mouse Genome Informatics Database (MGI, http://www.informatics.jax.org/), the Rat Genome Database (RGD, http://rgd.mcw.edu), the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Animals (OMIA, http://omia.angis.org.au/) and elsewhere. Use of this ontology allows comparisons of data from diverse sources, can facilitate comparisons across mammalian species, assists in identifying appropriate experimental disease models, and aids in the discovery of candidate disease genes and molecular signaling pathways.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wsbm.44

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Disease Ontology data were further extended and newer ontologies such as Rat Disease Ontology and Mammalian Phenotype Ontology were added to facilitate comparison of target-disease and target-phenotype associations across multiple species.

    “The Disease Ontology (DO) (8) data were further extended and newer ontologies such as Rat Disease Ontology (9) and Mammalian Phenotype Ontology (10) were added to facilitate comparison of target-disease and target-phenotype associations across multiple species.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, C. L., & Eppig, J. T.
Affiliations
Jackson Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Eppig, Janan T.
Venue
WIREs Systems Biology and Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-11
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
390-399
ISSN
  • 1939-005X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-5094
OpenAlex
W2010798628
Cited by
353
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 24
FWCI
5.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • WIREs Systems Biology and Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • The Mouseion at the JAXlibrary (Jackson Laboratory) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Human Genome Research Institute (HG000330, P41HG000330)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
Keywords
Mammalian Phenotype Ontology, phenotype annotation, mutant mouse models, mouse phenotypes, Mouse Genome Informatics, Rat Genome Database, candidate disease genes, molecular pathways, phenotypic data integration
MeSH terms
Animals, Classification, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Mammals, Mutation, Phenotype, Software, User-Computer Interface, Genomics, Mice, Data Mining

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review