Cited by 413Genomics and Rare DiseasesBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium: comprehensive knockout phenotyping underpinning the study of human disease

Open access
Groza, Tudor, Gomez, Federico Lopez, Mashhadi, Hamed Haseli, Muñoz-Fuentes, Violeta, Gunes, Osman, Wilson, Robert, Cacheiro, Pilar, Frost, Anthony +9 more·2023·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium (IMPC; https://www.mousephenotype.org/) web portal makes available curated, integrated and analysed knockout mouse phenotyping data generated by the IMPC project consisting of 85M data points and over 95,000 statistically significant phenotype hits mapped to human diseases. The IMPC portal delivers a substantial reference dataset that supports the enrichment of various domain-specific projects and databases, as well as the wider research and clinical community, where the IMPC genotype–phenotype knowledge contributes to the molecular diagnosis of patients affected by rare disorders. Data from 9,000 mouse lines and 750 000 images provides vital resources enabling the interpretation of the ignorome, and advancing our knowledge on mammalian gene function and the mechanisms underlying phenotypes associated with human diseases. The resource is widely integrated and the lines have been used in over 4,600 publications indicating the value of the data and the materials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkac972

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a growing body of evidence supporting the hypothesis that brain infection may be the primary cause of AD.

    “There is a growing body of evidence supporting the hypothesis that brain infection may be the primary cause of AD (69).”

    From Artificial Intelligence for Drug Discovery: Are We There Yet? (2024) · cites this paper as [69]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes the consortium’s mouse-phenotyping resource, while the Use Cases section discusses genetic models of neurodevelopmental disorders. Searches for brain infection, Alzheimer’s disease, and pathogens found no passage in our copy addressing the proposed cause of AD. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Groza, T., Gomez, F. L., Mashhadi, H. H., Muñoz-Fuentes, V., Gunes, O., Wilson, R., Cacheiro, P., Frost, A., Keskivali-Bond, P., Vardal, B., McCoy, A., Cheng, T. K., Santos, L., Wells, S., Smedley, D., Mallon, A.-M., & Parkinson, H.
Affiliations
  • European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
  • European Bioinformatics Institute, European Molecular Biology Laboratory , Welcome Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD, UK
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • Mary Lyon Centre at MRC Harwell (GB)
  • Research Data Team, The Turing Institute , 96 Euston Rd, London NW1 2DB, UK
  • The Alan Turing Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Groza, Tudor
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2022-10-28
Volume
51
Issue
D1
Pages
D1038-D1045
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W4307468105
Cited by
413
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 75 · 2025: 135 · 2024: 121 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 1
FWCI
52.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (2UM1HG006370-11)
  • EMBL-EBI Core Funding
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Keywords
International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium, genotype-phenotype mapping, human disease, rare diseases, molecular diagnosis, gene function, mouse lines
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Phenotype, Databases, Factual, Mice, Knockout, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review