The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Variables that influence the activity of captive orangutans
Abstract
It is well known that the environment significantly influences the behavior of captive animals. However, the specific nature of the cues that promote speciestypical behavior patterns is not usually known. This study extends an earlier investigation by Wilson (Zoo Biology 1: 201–209, 1982). The objective was to identify and quantify specific environmental components that influence activity levels in orangutans. Six enclosure variables were quantified, and activity levels measured, for 29 orangutans housed in nine zoological parks. Multiple regression analysis indicated that the combination of the number of animals, amount of usable surface area, number of movable objects, and enclosure volume was the best predictor of activity levels, accounting for 58% of the variance in activity levels. It was concluded that the provision of large enclosures, containing large numbers of movable objects and providing social opportunities, would promote higher levels of activity in captive orangutans. © 1992 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The presence of objects such as furnishings in the enclosure increases activity levels in captive orang utans.
“as does the presence of objects such as furnishings in the enclosure (Perkins 1992;Wilson 1982;Stevenson 1983)”
From Effects of browse, human visitors and noise on the behaviour of captive orang-utans (2002) · cites this paper as Perkins 1992
The presence of fresh browse increased overall activity and foraging for small food items beneath the browse material.
“The presence of fresh browse increased overall activity and foraging for small food items beneath the browse material”
From Effects of browse, human visitors and noise on the behaviour of captive orang-utans (2002) · cites this paper as Perkins 1992
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- Afifi A. A., 1984, Computer‐aided multivariate analysis
- 10.1163/156853974X00534 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/zoo.1430050307 · DOI
- Bryant C. E., 1988, Effects of different environmental enrichment devices on cage stereotypies and autoaggression in captive cynomolgus monkeys, Journal of medical primatology, 17, 257, 10.1111/j.1600-0684.1988.tb00388.x · DOI
- Chamove A. S., 1982, Deep woodchip litter: hygiene, feeding, and behavioral enhancement in eight primate species, International journal for the study of animal problems, 3, 308
- 10.1002/zoo.1430010411 · DOI
- Cohen J., 1983, Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, second edition
- Galdikas B. M. F.:Orangutan Adaptation at Tanjung Puting Reserve Central Borneo. (Doctoral Dissertation University of California at Los Angeles). Dissertation Abstracts International. University Microfilms No. 7915695 1978.
- Line S. W., 1987, Environmental enrichment for laboratory primates, Journal of the american veterinary medicine association, 190, 854
- 10.1016/S0003-3472(74)80054-0 · DOI
- Maple T. L., 1979, Captivity and behavior: primates in breeding colonies, laboratories and zoos, 239
- Maple T. L., 1980, Orangutan behavior
- Maple T. L.: Evaluating captive environments.Annual proceedings of the american association of zoo veterinarians 1981.
- Maple T. L., 1983, Environmental psychology and great ape reproduction, International journal for the study of animal problems, 4, 295
- 10.1002/zoo.1430080511 · DOI
- 10.1002/zoo.1430050404 · DOI
- Norusis M. J., 1990, Spss/pc + statistics 4.0
- 10.1002/zoo.1430070103 · DOI
- 10.1002/zoo.1430060406 · DOI
- Snyder R. L., 1975, Research in zoos and aquariums, 41
- Sommer R., 1974, Tight spaces: hard architecture and how to humanize it
- 10.1002/zoo.1430040205 · DOI
- 10.1002/zoo.1430040303 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/zoo.1430040402 · DOI
- Williams C. J., 1984, Annual proceedings, 186
- 10.1002/zoo.1430010304 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF02382806 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sources of stress in captivity
Morgan, K. N., & Tromborg, C. T. (2007) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.032 · Cited by 1,085
How does the zoo environment affect the behaviour of captive primates?
Hosey, G. R. (2005) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2004.08.015 · Cited by 362
A preliminary model of human-animal relationships in the zoo
Hosey, G. (2008) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2007.04.013 · Cited by 197
Effects of browse, human visitors and noise on the behaviour of captive orang-utans
Birke, L. (2002) · Animal Welfare · doi:10.1017/s0962728600028141 · Cited by 151
Husbandry and enclosure influences on penguin behavior and conservation breeding
Marshall, A. R., Deere, N. J., Little, H. A., Snipp, R., Goulder, J., & Mayer-Clarke, S. (2016) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.21313 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Perkins, L. A.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Perkins, Lorraine A.
- Venue
- Zoo Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 177-186
- ISSN
- 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2361
- OpenAlex
- W2057345713
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Memphis Zoo
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- orangutans, captive animal behavior, activity level, enclosure design, social environment, surface area, movable objects, animal density, zoo animal welfare
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review