Visitor interest in zoo animals and the implications for collection planning and zoo education programmes
Abstract
As zoos have sought to further their conservation missions, they have become powerful providers of environmental education. Outside of "formal" education initiatives, such as those designed for school and other organized groups, or structured public talks programmes, much of the learning potential that the zoo has to offer is around the viewing of animals and the response of visitors to them. In this, zoo learning is a very personal construct, develops from the previous knowledge, and experiences and motivations of each individual. In this article, we make the assertion that learning potential, although difficult to quantify, is very much related to the attractiveness of animal species and the interest that visitors show in them. Using standard behaviorist measures of attraction and interest (the proportion of visitors that stop and for how long), we analyzed the relative interest in 40 zoo species held in a modern UK zoo and the variables that are significant in predicting that popularity. Further to this, the suggestion is made that the zoo collection planning process could use such information to make more informed decisions about which species should be housed for their educational value. Taxonomic grouping was found to be the most significant predictor of visitor interest--that is, visitors were far more interested in mammals than any other group--although body size (length), increasing animal activity and whether the species was the primary or "flagship" species in an e…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MSE detracts species-specific education as it allows visitors to be selective with the species they engage with like 'popular' species regardless of the broader theme of the exhibit, however they can promote education for the preferred species.
“(Moss & Esson, 2010) argues MSE detracts species-specific education at it allows visitors to be selective with the species they engage with like 'popular' species regardless of the broader theme of the exhibit, however they can promote education for the preferred species.”
From An Investigation into the Perception and Prevalence of Mixed-Species Exhibits in Zoos and Aquaria (2022) · cites this paper as Moss & Esson, 2010
Species who pose higher conservation value are more commonly presented within collections, raising awareness.
“Moss & Esson, (2010) suggests species who pose higher conservation value are more commonly presented within collections, raising awareness.”
From An Investigation into the Perception and Prevalence of Mixed-Species Exhibits in Zoos and Aquaria (2022) · cites this paper as Moss & Esson, (2010)
Charismatic colouration and novel appearance have proven to be powerful visitor draws and elicit increased dwell times.
“Charismatic colouration and novel appearance have proven to be powerful visitor draws [21,27] and elicit increased dwell times [87].”
From Tiger colour morphs in zoos raise conservation and welfare concerns (2026) · cites this paper as [87]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ideal animals and animal traits for zoos: General public perspectives
Carr, N. (2016) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2016.05.013 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
The impact of visitors on non-primate species in zoos: a quantitative review
Williams, E., Hunton, V., Hosey, G., & Ward, S. J. (2023) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani13071178 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Longitudinal improvements in zoo-housed elephant welfare: a case study at ZSL Whipsnade Zoo
Finch, K., Sach, F., Fitzpatrick, M., Masters, N., & Rowden, L. J. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10112029 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
An Investigation into the Perception and Prevalence of Mixed-Species Exhibits in Zoos and Aquaria
Green, H., Palmer, G. A., & Brereton, J. E. (2022) · Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities · doi:10.56397/jrssh.2022.12.02 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“(Moss & Esson, 2010) argues MSE detracts species-specific education at it allows visitors to be selective with the species they engage with like ‘popular’ species regardless of the broader theme of the exhibit, however they can promote education for the preferred species.”
BackgroundTiger colour morphs in zoos raise conservation and welfare concerns
Erzinçlioğlu, T. S., Piaz, M. T., Chinpilas, T., Hunnestad, A. V., Godfrey, L., & Fourage, A. (2026) · Discover Animals · doi:10.1007/s44338-026-00163-5
- Authors
- Moss, A., & Esson, M.
- Affiliations
- Chester Zoo (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Moss, Andrew
- ORCID
- Moss, Andrew
- Venue
- Zoo Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 715-731
- ISSN
- 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2361
- OpenAlex
- W2077264364
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 5.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Animal and Plant Science Education
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Museology › Museums and Cultural Heritage
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Keywords
- zoo animals, zoo education, environmental education, animal attraction, visitor behavior, taxonomic grouping, mammals, body size, animal activity, flagship species
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animals, Zoo, Attention, Conservation of Natural Resources, Education, United Kingdom, Humans, Public Opinion, Regression Analysis, Species Specificity, Time Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review