The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Complete Nutrient Content of Four Species of Feeder Insects
Abstract
A variety of insects are commonly fed to captive insectivores but detailed nutritional analyses are only available for the most commonly fed species. Soldier fly larvae, Turkestan cockroach nymphs, tebo worms, and adult house flies were analyzed for moisture, protein, fat, ash, acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber, minerals, amino acids, fatty acids, vitamins, and selected carotenoids. The acid detergent fiber was analyzed for amino acids to estimate chitin content. Nutrient content varied widely between the four insect species. Ranges for the macronutrients were as follows: moisture (60.2–74.8%), crude protein (15.5–19.7%), crude fat (1.9%–29.4%), acid detergent fiber (1.4–3.0%), neutral detergent fiber (2.6–3.8%), and ash (0.8–3.5%). Energy content ranged from a low of 918 kcal/kg for house flies to 2,977 kcal/kg for tebo worms. The chitin content of these four species ranged from 6.7 to 21.0 mg/kg. The nutrients most likely to be deficient when these species of insects are used as food for insectivores are vitamin A, vitamin D, calcium, vitamin E, thiamine, iodine, and vitamin B 12. The number of nutrients deficient vs. the NRC requirements for rats on an energy basis by insect species was as follows: soldier fly larvae (3), tebo worms (15), Turkestan cockroach nymphs (5), and adult house flies (6). These data are valuable in helping assess the nutrient intake of captive insectivores and in developing gut‐loading diets to improve the nutrient intake of captive insectivores. Zoo Biol. 32:27‐36, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Spranghers, T., Ottoboni, M., Klootwijk, C., Ovyn, A., Deboosere, S., De Meulenaer, B., Michiels, J., Eeckhout, M., De Clercq, P., & De Smet, S. (2017) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.8081 · Cited by 970
Review of black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) as animal feed and human food.
Wang, Y.-S., & Shelomi, M. (2017) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods6100091 · Cited by 812
EFSA Scientific Committee (2015) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4257 · Cited by 804
Barragan-Fonseca, K. B., Dicke, M., & van Loon, J. J. A. (2017) · Journal of Insects as Food and Feed · doi:10.3920/jiff2016.0055 · Cited by 771
Gold, M., Tomberlin, J. K., Diener, S., Zurbrügg, C., & Mathys, A. (2018) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.10.022 · Cited by 528
Metadata
- Authors
- Finke, M. D.
- Venue
- Zoo Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-06-11
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-36
- ISSN
- 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2361
- OpenAlex
- W2109703362
- Cited by
- 464
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complete Nutrient Content of Four Species of Feeder Insects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/zoo.21012
- The paper
- Finke, M. D. (2013). Complete Nutrient Content of Four Species of Feeder Insects. Zoo Biology. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.