A Survey of Husbandry Practices for Lorisid Primates in N orth A merican Zoos and Related Facilities
Abstract
Zoos and related facilities in North America currently manage five species in the primate family Lorisidae: the greater (Nycticebus coucang), Bengal (N. bengalensis) and pygmy (N. pygmaeus) slow lorises, red slender loris (Loris tardigradus), and potto (Perodicticus potto). We used an online survey to describe institutional housing and husbandry practices for these species and assess the extent to which practices are consistent with established guidelines. Our results show that most captive lorisids are housed solitarily or in pairs. Most individuals occupy a single exhibit space in a building dedicated to nocturnal animals. Facilities are commonly meeting recommendations for abiotic exhibit design and are providing animals with an enriched environment. However, pottos and slender lorises currently occupy exhibit spaces smaller than the recommended minimum, and the impact of cleaning protocols on olfactory communication should be critically evaluated. Few facilities are taking advantage of the benefits of positive reinforcement training for promoting animal welfare. Research is greatly needed on the effects of exhibit lighting on behavior, health, and reproduction; and to determine how best to manage the social needs of lorisids with naturally dispersed social structures. Although captive populations of slender lorises, pottos, and slow lorises are declining, we suggest that improved husbandry knowledge has the potential to positively influence population sustainability and t…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Species within a MSE were often managed by two or more keepers ensuring optimal husbandry was maintained.
“Fuller et al., (2012) assessed keeper management of a mixed Lorisidae exhibit, and stated species within a MSE were often managed be two or more keepers ensuring optimal husbandry was maintained, supporting this study.”
From An Investigation into the Perception and Prevalence of Mixed-Species Exhibits in Zoos and Aquaria (2022) · cites this paper as Fuller et al., (2012)
Cites
The dark side of light at night: physiological, epidemiological, and ecological consequences
Navara, K. J., & Nelson, R. J. (2007) · Journal of Pineal Research · doi:10.1111/j.1600-079x.2007.00473.x · Cited by 795 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An animal welfare risk assessment process for zoos
Sherwen, S. L., Hemsworth, L. M., Beausoleil, N. J., Embury, A., & Mellor, D. J. (2018) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani8080130 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Meehan, C. L., Hogan, J. N., Bonaparte-Saller, M. K., & Mench, J. A. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146703 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
An Investigation into the Perception and Prevalence of Mixed-Species Exhibits in Zoos and Aquaria
Green, H., Palmer, G. A., & Brereton, J. E. (2022) · Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities · doi:10.56397/jrssh.2022.12.02 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Fuller et al., (2012) assessed keeper management of a mixed Lorisidae exhibit, and stated species within a MSE were often managed be two or more keepers ensuring optimal husbandry was maintained, supporting this study.”
Result
- Authors
- Fuller, G., Kuhar, C. W., Dennis, P. M., & Lukas, K. E.
- Affiliations
- Cleveland Metroparks Zoo (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fuller, Grace
- Venue
- Zoo Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-11-15
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 88-100
- ISSN
- 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2361
- OpenAlex
- W1871012910
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 3.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
- Keywords
- Lorisidae, slow lorises, potto, zoo animal welfare, exhibition design, environmental enrichment, olfactory communication, cleaning protocols, positive reinforcement training, social needs, nocturnal animals
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Husbandry, Animals, Zoo, Conservation of Natural Resources, Data Collection, Fertility, Housing, Animal, Lorisidae, North America, Species Specificity, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review