Cited by 65Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorNutritional Studies and DietFood, Nutrition, and Cultural Practices

Assessing Eating Patterns—an Emerging Research Topic in Nutritional Sciences: Introduction to the Symposium

OLTERSDORF, U., SCHLETTWEIN-GSELL, D., WINKLER, G.·1999·Appetite

Abstract

In order to stimulate food habit research in nutritional sciences, in 1994 the International Union of Nutritional Sciences (IUNS) established Committee II/2 on Nutrition and Food Habits, which has the charge "to review the impact of changing food choice and habits on nutritional status". Within this broad task, priority has been given to methodological aspects of studies on the spatio-temporal structure of food and drink intake. Some principles of the study of eating patterns and the status of this research topic nutrition are described as an introduction to selected papers of a workshop on "Methodology to Identify and to Assess Eating Patterns" organized by the IUNS committee and held during the 16th International Congress of Nutrition in Montreal (Canada) on 28 July 1997.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/appe.1998.0189

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although there has been general consensus that a universally accepted definition of a meal is crucial, there have been few attempts to define meals in a consistent and standardised way.

    “Although over the past few decades there has been general consensus that a universally accepted definition of a meal is crucial( 54 , 98 ), there have been few attempts to define meals in a consistent and standardised way.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
OLTERSDORF, U., SCHLETTWEIN-GSELL, D., & WINKLER, G.
Affiliations
Helmholtz Munich (DE)
Corresponding author
OLTERSDORF, U.
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-02
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
1-7
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092896397
Cited by
65
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OpenAgrar (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food, Nutrition, and Cultural Practices
Keywords
dietary habits, dietary assessment, food choice, nutritional status
MeSH terms
Feeding Behavior, Humans, Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Nutrition Surveys, Nutritional Status, Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review