Cited by 233Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorNutritional Studies and DietDietary Effects on Health

Meal and Snack Patterns Are Associated with Dietary Intake of Energy and Nutrients in US Adults

Kerver, Jean M., Yang, Eun Ju, Obayashi, Saori, Bianchi, Leonard, Song, Won O.·2006·Journal of the American Dietetic Association

Abstract

Objective This study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that specific meal and snack patterns are associated with selected nutrient intakes in US adults.Design Using the 24-hour dietary recall from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, meal and snack patterns were described in relation to nutrient intakes.Subjects The study included US adults aged 20 years or older (n=15,978).Statistical analyses performed All statistical analyses accounted for the survey design and sample weights. Linear regression analyses controlled for confounding factors, including energy intakes. Wald F tests were used for determination of significance between means of nutrient intakes by daily eating frequency or meal pattern groups.Results Daily eating frequency was positively related to carbohydrate, folic acid, vitamin C, calcium, magnesium, iron, potassium, and fiber intakes and inversely related to protein, total fat, cholesterol, and sodium intakes. Meal patterns were further categorized into the five most commonly reported meal and snack combinations by population percentages including breakfast (B), lunch (L), dinner (D), and > or =2 snacks (S) (31.6%); B, L, D and 1 S (15.4%); B, D and > or =2 S (13.1%); B, L, D (8.3%); and L, D and > or =2 S (7.6%). Groups reporting B, L, D and 1 S and B, L, D and > or =2 S had the highest intakes of all micronutrients examined except cholesterol, vitamin B-6, and sodium. Breakfast skippers (L, D and > or =2 S) had the lowest intakes of all micronutrients examined except sodium.Conclusions Findings from this cross-sectional survey suggest that meal and snack patterns may be markers for nutrient intakes and therefore diet quality. Complete nutrient intakes should be considered in investigations of meal patterns and health outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jada.2005.09.045

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Meal patterns were mostly participant-identified, although these studies varied in the additional criteria used to determine an individual eating occasion, meal and/or snack, and their treatment of beverages.

    “Meal patterns were mostly participant-identified( 15 , 23 , 45 – 48 , 52 , 53 , 57 , 66 , 69 , 70 , 75 , 77 , 78 , 82 ), although these studies varied in the additional criteria used to determine an individual EO, meal and/or snack, and their treatment of beverages.”
  • Only thirteen of these studies examined more than one micronutrient.

    “However, only thirteen of these examined more than one micronutrient( 23 , 30 , 46 , 47 , 52 , 64 – 71 ).”
  • Eleven studies applied no additional criteria, whereas other studies delineated eating occasions using 15-min, 30-min, 45-min plus 50 kcal, or 59-min intervals.

    “For example, eleven studies( 23 , 45 – 47 , 52 , 66 , 69 , 75 , 78 , 80 , 82 ) applied no additional criteria, whereas in other studies, EO were delineated using 15-min time intervals( 57 , 70 , 77 ), a 30-min interval( 53 ), a 45-min interval plus a 50 kcal (210 kJ) energy criterion( 15 ) and a 59-min interval (applied to meals only)( 48 ).”
  • In these studies, a higher eating frequency was also associated with higher nutrient densities of folate, vitamin C and Fe, and Ca and K.

    “In these studies, a higher eating frequency was also associated with higher nutrient densities of folate, vitamin C and Fe( 52 , 80 ), and Ca and K( 52 ).”
  • Adjustment for multiple important sociodemographic and lifestyle-related confounders and exclusion of energy misreporters did not attenuate the significance of the results in these two studies.

    “Adjustment for multiple important sociodemographic and lifestyle-related confounders( 52 ) and exclusion of energy misreporters( 80 ) did not attenuate the significance of the results in these two studies.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kerver, J. M., Yang, E. J., Obayashi, S., Bianchi, L., & Song, W. O.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Honam University (KR)
Corresponding author
Song, Won O.
Venue
Journal of the American Dietetic Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
106
Issue
1
Pages
46-53
ISSN
0002-8223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2012615500
Cited by
232
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
FWCI
12.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Dietetic Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
Keywords
meal patterns, meal frequency, nutrient intake, breakfast skipping, diet quality, micronutrient intake, macronutrient intake, sodium intake, cholesterol intake, energy intake, adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Energy Intake, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Fats, Dietary Fiber, Dietary Proteins, Eating, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutrition Surveys, Time Factors, United States, Linear Models, Micronutrients

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review