Cited by 94Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorEating Disorders and BehaviorsRegulation of Appetite and Obesity

“Is this a meal or snack?” Situational cues that drive perceptions

Wansink, Brian, Payne, Collin R., Shimizu, Mitsuru·2010·Appetite

Abstract

What determines whether a person perceives an eating occasion as a meal or snack? The answer may influence what and how much they eat on that occasion and over the remainder of the day. A survey of 122 participants indicated that they used food cues (such as the food quality, portion size, perceived healthfulness, and preparation time) as well as environmental cues (such as the presence of friends and family, whether one is seated, and the quality of napkins and plates) to determine if they were eating a meal rather than a snack. Implications for dieters and for health professionals are provided.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2009.09.016

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research suggests that situational cues such as the type, quality or amount of food and the presence of others may affect a participant's decision to classify an eating occasion as a meal or a snack.

    “Previous research suggests that situational cues such as the type, quality or amount of food and the presence of others may affect a participant's decision to classify an EO as a meal or a snack( 95 ).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wansink, B., Payne, C. R., & Shimizu, M.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • New Mexico State University (US)
Corresponding author
Wansink, Brian
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
214-216
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099902237
Cited by
94
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2019-03-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Keywords
food cues, environmental cues, portion size, perceived healthfulness, food preparation time, social eating, dieters, dietary habits
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Appetite Regulation, Cues, Diet, Drive, Feeding Behavior, Female, Food, Humans, Male, Perception, Satiety Response, Social Behavior, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review