The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intelligence and the Frontal Lobe: The Organization of Goal-Directed Behavior
Abstract
Basic to the study of individual differences is the concept of 'general intelligence' or Spearman's g. In this article we suggest that g is largely a reflection of the control functions of the frontal lobe. A series of experiments investigates a phenomenon we call goal neglect: disregard of a task requirement event though it has been understood and remembered. Subjectively it is as though the neglected requirement "slips the subject's mind." Previously described in frontal patients, we show that goal neglect can also be seen in some members of the normal population. In line with conventional distinctions between controlled and automatic processing, eliciting conditions for goal neglect include novelty, weak error feedback, and multiple concurrent task requirements. Under these conditions neglect is linked closely to g and extremely common after frontal lesions. Following many other models, we suggest that behavior in any task is structured by a set of action constraints or requirements, derived in part from verbal instructions and specified at multiple levels of abstraction. A frontal process of constraint or requirement activation is fundamental to Spearman's g.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“there appears to be a growing consensus that functions subsumed under the heading of ''executive functions'' or ''cognitive control'' are involved at the behavioral level”
From Enrichment Effects on Adult Cognitive Development: Can the Functional Capacity of Older Adults Be Preserved and Enhanced? (2008) · cites this paper as Duncan, Emslie, Williams, Johnson, & Freer, 1996
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–902 of 902
Xie, H., Yaacob, N. R. N., & Ouyang, H. (2026) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107382 · Cited by 1
Neural dynamics underlying minute-timescale persistent behaviour in the human brain
Courellis, H. S., Kyzar, M., Minxha, J., Cardenas, A. R., Valiante, T. A., Mamelak, A. N., Adolphs, R., & Rutishauser, U. (2026) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-026-02537-x · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Duncan, J., Emslie, H., Williams, P., Johnson, R., & Freer, C.
- Affiliations
- Addenbrooke's Hospital (GB)
- Venue
- Cognitive Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 257-303
- ISSN
- 0010-0285 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1989920002
- Cited by
- 902
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 6.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- general intelligence, frontal lobe, goal neglect, goal-directed behavior, frontal lobe lesions, task demands, error feedback, novelty, individual differences, action constraints
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Arousal, Attention, Brain Damage, Chronic, Brain Mapping, Concept Formation, Dichotic Listening Tests, Female, Frontal Lobe, Goals, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Mental Recall, Speech Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review