The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Developmental Differences in Children′s Gender Schemata about Others: A Meta-analytic Review
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Inconsistencies that have been reported in past research on developmental changes in gender schemata actually may be a consequence of differences in the way these schemata have been conceptualized and measured. Meta-analysis was used to evaluate this interpretation of past work. On forced choice measures, in which children must select one sex or the other for each item (e.g., "Who is the strong one?"), "correct" matches to societal stereotypes increased with age. Increases were not, however, related to the type of question used (e.g., "Who is ...?" versus "Who can ...?"). Girls made more stereotype matches than boys, although the magnitude of the effect was small. In contrast, on nonforced choice measures, type of question did affect results. Children showed increases in nonstereotyped responses with age, but especially when asked "Who should . . ." or "Who can . . ." , and when elementary-school-aged (as well as preschool-aged) children were included. Girls gave significantly more nonstereotyped responses than boys, especially among older samples and when the domain was traits. Both the age and the sex effects in nonstereotyped responses were larger in more recent studies. IQ and television viewing were significantly related to forced choice scores, whereas television viewing, maternal employment, and memory for gender-stereotyped material were all significantly related to non-forced choice scores. Implications for the distinction between knowledge of stereotypes and attitudes toward stereotypes are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
Devine, P. G. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5 · Cited by 5,673
Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing.
Bem, S. L. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.4.354 · Cited by 3,861
Meta-analysis in social research
(1982) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(82)90011-8 · Cited by 3,853
Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-role interpretation
Eagly, A. H. (2013) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203781906 · Cited by 3,320
Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation.
Doherty, E. G., & Eagly, A. H. (1989) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2073813 · Cited by 3,266
Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications
Rabkin, L. Y. (1987) · American Journal of Psychotherapy · doi:10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1987.41.1.146 · Cited by 3,187
THE DEVELOPMENT OF SEX DIFFERENCES
&NA; (1967) · The American Journal of the Medical Sciences · doi:10.1097/00000441-196708000-00046 · Cited by 1,799
The development of sex differences
Maccoby, E. E. (1966) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,033
A cognitive-development analysis of children's sex-role concepts and attitudes
Kohlberg, L. (1966) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 990
A cognitive-developmental analysis of children's sex role concepts and attitudes
Kohlberg, L. (1966) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 809
Cited by
Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation.
Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.106.4.676 · Cited by 2,476
Patterns of gender development
Martin, C. L., & Ruble, D. N. (2010) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100511 · Cited by 600
A developmental intergroup theory of social stereotypes and prejudice
Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S. (2006) · Advances in Child Development and Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-2407(06)80004-2 · Cited by 481
Self-citationHe is a Stud, She is a Slut! A Meta-Analysis on the Continued Existence of Sexual Double Standards
Endendijk, J. J., van Baar, A. L., & Deković, M. (2020) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868319891310 · Cited by 200
Social status as a predictor of race and gender stereotypes in late childhood and early adolescence
Rowley, S. J., Kurtz‐Costes, B., Mistry, R., & Feagans, L. (2007) · Social Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00376.x · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Signorella, M. L., Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S.
- Venue
- Developmental Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-06
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 147-183
- ISSN
- 0273-2297 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039033408
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 66
- FWCI
- 12.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Developmental Differences in Children′s Gender Schemata about Others: A Meta-analytic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/drev.1993.1007
- The paper
- Signorella, M. L., Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S. (1993). Developmental Differences in Children′s Gender Schemata about Others: A Meta-analytic Review. Developmental Review. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1993.1007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.