Cited by 324Spinal Cord Injury ResearchNerve injury and regenerationStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Cortico–reticulo–spinal circuit reorganization enables functional recovery after severe spinal cord contusion

Open access
Asboth, Leonie, Friedli, Lucia, Beauparlant, Janine, Martinez-Gonzalez, Cristina, Anil, Selin, Rey, Elodie, Baud, Laetitia, Pidpruzhnykova, Galyna +8 more·2018·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Severe spinal cord contusions interrupt nearly all brain projections to lumbar circuits producing leg movement. Failure of these projections to reorganize leads to permanent paralysis. Here we modeled these injuries in rodents. A severe contusion abolished all motor cortex projections below injury. However, the motor cortex immediately regained adaptive control over the paralyzed legs during electrochemical neuromodulation of lumbar circuits. Glutamatergic reticulospinal neurons with residual projections below the injury relayed the cortical command downstream. Gravity-assisted rehabilitation enabled by the neuromodulation therapy reinforced these reticulospinal projections, rerouting cortical information through this pathway. This circuit reorganization mediated a motor cortex-dependent recovery of natural walking and swimming without requiring neuromodulation. Cortico-reticulo-spinal circuit reorganization may also improve recovery in humans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41593-018-0093-5

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reticulospinal neurons from the vGi mediate the volitional modulation of walking during EES.

    “We also know that reticulospinal neurons from the vGi mediate the volitional modulation of walking during EES28.”

    From The neurons that restore walking after paralysis (2022) · cites this paper as [28]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Asboth, L., Friedli, L., Beauparlant, J., Martinez-Gonzalez, C., Anil, S., Rey, E., Baud, L., Pidpruzhnykova, G., Anderson, M. A., Shkorbatova, P., Batti, L., Pagès, S., Kreider, J., Schneider, B. L., Barraud, Q., & Courtine, G.
Affiliations
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • Pavlov Institute of Physiology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
  • Wyss Center for Bio and Neuroengineering (CH)
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2018-03-19
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
576-588
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2791494966
Cited by
324
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 16 · 2014: 1
FWCI
25.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Kissei
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
spinal cord contusion, circuit reorganization, functional recovery, reticulospinal neurons, motor cortex, locomotor recovery, paralysis, spinal cord injury
MeSH terms
Channelrhodopsins, Animals, Brain, Vestibular Nucleus, Lateral, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Motor Cortex, Psychomotor Performance, Quipazine, Rats, Inbred Lew, Spinal Cord, Spinal Cord Injuries, Serotonin Receptor Agonists, 8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin, Thy-1 Antigens, Recovery of Function, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review