Cited by 117Barrier Structure and Function StudiesDrug Transport and Resistance MechanismsAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Impairment of the Blood–Nerve and Blood–Brain Barriers in Apolipoprotein E Knockout Mice

Fullerton, Stephanie M., Shirman, Gregory A., Strittmatter, Warren J., Matthew, William D.·2001·Experimental Neurology

Abstract

Apolipoprotein E (apoE) is well characterized as a plasma lipoprotein involved in lipid and cholesterol metabolism. Recent studies implicating apoE in Alzheimer's disease and successful recovery from neurological injury have stimulated much interest in the functions of apoE within the brain. To explore the functions of apoE within the nervous system, we examined apoE knockout (KO) mice. Previously, we showed that apoE KO mice have a delayed response to noxious thermal stimuli associated with a loss and abnormal morphology of unmyelinated fibers in the sciatic nerve. From these data, we hypothesized that apoE KO mice could have an impaired blood-nerve barrier (BNB). In this report, we demonstrate functionally impaired blood-nerve and blood-brain barriers (BBB) in apoE KO mice using immunofluorescent detection of serum protein leakage into nervous tissue as a diagnostic for decreased BNB and BBB integrity. Extensive extravasation of serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) is detected in the sciatic nerve, spinal cord, and cerebellum of apoE KO but not WT mice. In a subpopulation of apoE KO mice, IgG also extravasates into discrete cortical and subcortical locations, including hippocampus. Loss of BBB integrity was additionally confirmed by the ability of exogenously supplied Evans blue dye to penetrate the BBB and to colocalize with IgG immunoreactivity in CNS tissue. These observations support a role for apoE in maintaining the integrity of the BNB/BBB and suggest a novel relationship be…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/exnr.2001.7631

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fullerton, S. M., Shirman, G. A., Strittmatter, W. J., & Matthew, W. D.
Affiliations
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Venue
Experimental Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-05
Volume
169
Issue
1
Pages
13-22
ISSN
0014-4886 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004063915
Cited by
117
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
apolipoprotein E, blood-nerve barrier, blood-brain barrier, Evans blue, sciatic nerve, spinal cord, cerebellum, hippocampus, nerve injury, ApoE-deficient mice, neuroprotection
MeSH terms
Animals, Apolipoproteins E, Blood-Brain Barrier, Capillary Permeability, Cerebellum, Cerebral Cortex, Evans Blue, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Hippocampus, Immunoglobulin G, Sciatic Nerve, Spinal Cord, Mice, Knockout, Sciatic Neuropathy, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review