Quantal Response Equilibria for Normal Form Games

McKelvey, Richard D., Palfrey, Thomas R.·1995·Games and Economic Behavior

DOI 10.1006/game.1995.1023

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/game.1995.1023

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355399556151 · Cited by 11,264
A survey of experimental research on contests, all-pay auctions and tournaments
Dechenaux, E., Kovenock, D., & Sheremeta, R. M. (2015) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-014-9421-0 · Cited by 706
Overcommunication in strategic information transmission games
Cai, H., & Wang, J. T.-Y. (2006) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2005.04.001 · Cited by 370
The anatomy of choice: active inference and agency
Friston, K., Schwartenbeck, P., FitzGerald, T., Moutoussis, M., Behrens, T., & Dolan, R. J. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00598 · Cited by 340
The anatomy of choice: dopamine and decision-making.
Friston, K., Schwartenbeck, P., FitzGerald, T., Moutoussis, M., Behrens, T., & Dolan, R. J. (2014) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0481 · Cited by 289
Risk averse behavior in generalized matching pennies games
Goeree, J. K., Holt, C. A., & Palfrey, T. R. (2003) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0899-8256(03)00052-6 · Cited by 258
Self-citation
Reinforcement learning and decision making in monkeys during a competitive game
Lee, D., Conroy, M. L., McGreevy, B. P., & Barraclough, D. J. (2004) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.07.007 · Cited by 156
Dissociable neural representations of reinforcement and belief prediction errors underlie strategic learning
Zhu, L., Mathewson, K. E., & Hsu, M. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1116783109 · Cited by 125
Coordination versus differentiation in a standards war: 56K modems
Augereau, A., Greenstein, S., & Rysman, M. (2006) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00062.x · Cited by 114
Lobbying and Influence
Leech, B. L. (2010) · The Oxford Handbook of American Political Parties and Interest Groups · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542628.003.0028 · Cited by 91
Meta-learning of Sequential Strategies
Ortega, P. A., Wang, J. X., Rowland, M., Genewein, T., Kurth-Nelson, Z., Pascanu, R., Heess, N., Veness, J., Pritzel, A., Sprechmann, P., et al. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.03030 · Cited by 47
Exploration-exploitation in multi-agent learning: Catastrophe theory meets game theory
Leonardos, S., & Piliouras, G. (2022) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2021.103653 · Cited by 39
The Corona-Pandemic: A Game-Theoretic Perspective on Regional and Global Governance
Caparrós, A., & Finus, M. (2020) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-020-00475-4 · Cited by 26
Untitled work
(1998) · American Economic Review

Authors: McKelvey, R. D., & Palfrey, T. R.
Venue: Games and Economic Behavior
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 1995-07
Volume: 10
Issue: 1
Pages: 6-38
ISSN: 0899-8256 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1006/game.1995.1023
OpenAlex: W2264897026
Cited by: 2,545
References: 0
FWCI: 25.10
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review