CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 205

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cladistics Is Useful for Reconstructing Archaeological Phylogenies: Palaeoindian Points from the Southeastern United States

O'Brien, Michael J., Darwent, John, Lyman, R.Lee·2001·Journal of Archaeological Science
DOI 10.1006/jasc.2001.0681
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jasc.2001.0681

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • EA has used methods including frequency and occurrence seriation, clade-diversity diagrams, and cladograms to determine empirically whether functional units influence reproductive success.

    “And despite Bamforth's claims, EA has used a battery of methods, including frequency and occurrence seriation, clade-diversity diagrams, and cladograms, to determine this empirically (Lyman and O'Brien 2000;O'Brien and Lyman 2000b;O'Brien et al. 2001O'Brien et al. ,2002)).”

    From What Is Evolution? A Response to Bamforth (2003) · cites this paper as O'Brien et al. 2001

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. Anderson, 1991, Examining prehistoric settlement distribution in eastern North America, Archaeology of Eastern North America, 19, 1
  2. Anderson, 1998, The distribution of fluted Paleoindian projectile points: Update 1998, Archaeology of Eastern North America, 26, 163
  3. Anderson, 2000, Palaeoindian artefact distributions: Evidence and implications, Antiquity, 74, 507, 10.1017/S0003598X00059846 · DOI
  4. Anderson, 2000, Paleoindian colonization of the Americas: Implications from an examination of physiography, demography, and artifact distribution, American Antiquity, 65, 43, 10.2307/2694807 · DOI
  5. Bell, 1953, Selected projectile point types of the United States, Oklahoma Anthropological Society, Bulletin, 1, 1
  6. Bellwood, 1996, Phylogeny vs reticulation in prehistory, Antiquity, 70, 881, 10.1017/S0003598X00084131 · DOI
  7. Benton, 1997, Congruence between phylogenetic and stratigraphic data on the history of life, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences, 264, 885, 10.1098/rspb.1997.0123 · DOI
  8. Benton, 1999, Assessing congruence between cladistic and stratigraphic data, Systematic Biology, 48, 581, 10.1080/106351599260157 · DOI
  9. Boas, 1904, The history of anthropology, Science, 20, 513, 10.1126/science.20.512.513 · DOI
  10. Brady, 1985, On the independence of systematics, Cladistics, 1, 113, 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1985.tb00416.x · DOI
  11. Breitburg, 1994, Paleoindian site, lithic, and mastodon distributions in Tennessee, Current Research in the Pleistocene, 11, 9
  12. Brower, 2000, Evolution is not a necessary assumption of cladistics, Cladistics, 16, 143, 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2000.tb00351.x · DOI
  13. Carpenter, 1987, Cladistics of cladists, Cladistics, 3, 363, 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1987.tb00899.x · DOI
  14. Chapman, 1948, A preliminary survey of Missouri archaeology (part IV): Ancient cultures and sequence, The Missouri Archaeologist, 10, 133
  15. Coe, 1964, The Formative Cultures of the Carolina Piedmont, American Philosophical Society, Transactions, 54, 10.2307/3231919 · DOI
  16. Cracraft, 1981, The use of functional and adaptive criteria in phylogenetic systematics, American Zoologist, 21, 21, 10.1093/icb/21.1.21 · DOI
  17. DeJarnette, 1962, Stanfield–Worley Bluff Shelter excavations, Journal of Alabama Archaeology, 8
  18. Donoghue, 1989, The importance of fossils in phylogeny reconstruction, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 20, 431, 10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.002243 · DOI
  19. Dunnell, 1986, Methodological issues in Americanist artifact classification, Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 9, 149, 10.1016/B978-0-12-003109-2.50007-6 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Eldredge, 1997, On punctuated equilibria, Science, 276, 338, 10.1126/science.276.5311.337c · DOI
  21. Eldredge, 1985, Systematics and paleobiology, Paleobiology, 11, 65, 10.1017/S0094837300011404 · DOI
  22. Faught, 1994, North American Paleoindian database: An update, Current Research in the Pleistocene, 11, 32
  23. Foley, 1987, Hominid species and stone-tool assemblages: How are they related?, Antiquity, 61, 380, 10.1017/S0003598X00072938 · DOI
  24. Fox, 1999, Reconstructing phylogeny with and without temporal data, Science, 284, 1816, 10.1126/science.284.5421.1816 · DOI
  25. Gilmour, 1937, A taxonomic problem, Nature, 139, 1040, 10.1038/1391040a0 · DOI
  26. Goodenough, 1997, Comment on “The dimensions of social life in the Pacific: Human diversity and the myth of the primitive isolate” by Terrell, J. E., Hunt, T. L. & Gosden, C, Current Anthropology, 38, 177
  27. Goodyear, 1982, The chronological position of the Dalton horizon in the southeastern United States, American Antiquity, 47, 382, 10.2307/279909 · DOI
  28. Gould, 1977, Punctuated equilibria: The tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered, Paleobiology, 3, 115, 10.1017/S0094837300005224 · DOI
  29. Gould, 1986, Punctuated equilibrium at the third stage, Systematic Zoology, 35, 143, 10.2307/2413300 · DOI
  30. Griffin, 1977, A commentary on early man studies in the northeast, New York Academy of Sciences, Annals, 288, 3, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1977.tb33600.x · DOI
  31. Hoelzer, 1994, Patterns of speciation and limits to phylogenetic resolution, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 104, 10.1016/0169-5347(94)90207-0 · DOI
  32. Hull, 1979, The limits of cladism, Systematic Zoology, 28, 416, 10.2307/2412558 · DOI
  33. Jardine, 1969, A logical basis for biological classification, Systematic Zoology, 18, 37, 10.2307/2412409 · DOI
  34. Lee, 1997, The relationship between evolutionary theory and phylogenetic analysis, Biological Reviews, 72, 471, 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1997.tb00021.x · DOI
  35. Lewis, 1954, The Cumberland point, Oklahoma Anthropological Society, Bulletin, 2, 7
  36. Lewis, 1958, The Nuckolls site, Tennessee Archaeologist, 14, 60
  37. Lyman, 2000, Chronometers and units in early archaeology and paleontology, American Antiquity, 65, 691, 10.2307/2694422 · DOI
  38. Lyman, 2000, Measuring and explaining change in artifact variation with clade-diversity diagrams, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 19, 39, 10.1006/jaar.1999.0339 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Lyman, 1998, Seriation, superposition, and interdigitation: A history of Americanist graphic depictions of culture change, American Antiquity, 63, 239, 10.2307/2694696 · DOI
  40. Mason, 1962, The Paleo-Indian tradition in eastern North America, Current Anthropology, 3, 227, 10.1086/200289 · DOI
  41. Mayr, 1981, Biological classification: Toward a synthesis of opposing methodologies, Science, 214, 510, 10.1126/science.214.4520.510 · DOI
  42. McKitrick, 1994, On homology and the ontological relationship of parts, Systematic Biology, 43, 1, 10.1093/sysbio/43.1.1 · DOI
  43. Meltzer, 1988, Late Pleistocene human adaptations in eastern North America, Journal of World Prehistory, 2, 1, 10.1007/BF00975121 · DOI
  44. Moore, 1994, Ethnogenetic theories of human evolution, Research and Exploration, 10, 10
  45. Moore, 1994, Putting anthropology back together again: The ethnogenetic critique of cladistic theory, American Anthropologist, 96, 925, 10.1525/aa.1994.96.4.02a00110 · DOI
  46. Morse, 1973, Dalton culture in northeast Arkansas, The Florida Anthropologist, 26, 23
  47. Morrow, 1999, Geographic variation in fluted projectile points: A hemispheric perspective, American Antiquity, 64, 215, 10.2307/2694275 · DOI
  48. O'Brien, 2000, Meeting theoretical and methodological challenges to the future of evolutionary archaeology, Review of Archaeology, 20, 14
  49. O'Brien, 2002, The epistemological nature of archaeological units, Anthropological Theory, 10.1177/1463499602002001287 · DOI
  50. Patterson, 1988, Homology in classical and molecular biology, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 5, 603
  51. Platnick, 1979, Philosophy and the transformation of cladistics, Systematic Zoology, 28, 537, 10.2307/2412566 · DOI
  52. Platnick, 1985, Philosophy and the transformation of cladistics revisited, Cladistics, 1, 87, 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1985.tb00412.x · DOI
  53. Platnick, 1977, Cladistic methods in textual, linguistic, and phylogenetic analysis, Systematic Zoology, 26, 380, 10.2307/2412794 · DOI
  54. Rosen, 1982, Do current theories of evolution satisfy the basic requirements of explanation?, Systematic Biology, 31, 76, 10.1093/sysbio/31.1.76 · DOI
  55. Ross, 1997, Comment on “The dimensions of social life in the Pacific: Human diversity and the myth of the primitive isolate” by Terrell, J. E., Hunt, T. L. & Gosden, C, Current Anthropology, 38, 182
  56. Stevens, 1980, Evolutionary polarity of character states, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 11, 333, 10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.002001 · DOI
  57. Stevens, 1991, Character states, morphological variation, and phylogenetic analysis: A review, Systematic Botany, 16, 553, 10.2307/2419343 · DOI
  58. Terrell, 1997, The dimensions of social life in the Pacific: Human diversity and the myth of the primitive isolate, Current Anthropology, 38, 155, 10.1086/204604 · DOI
  59. Wiley, 1981
  60. Wiley, 1991
  61. Wills, 1999, Congruence between phylogeny and stratigraphy: Randomization tests and gap excess ratio, Systematic Biology, 48, 559, 10.1080/106351599260148 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
O'Brien, M. J., Darwent, J., & Lyman, R. L.
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-10
Volume
28
Issue
10
Pages
1115-1136
ISSN
0305-4403
DOI
10.1006/jasc.2001.0681
Cited by
205
References
2
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review