Cited by 203Memory Processes and InfluencesDeception detection and forensic psychologyChild and Animal Learning Development

Developmental differences in eyewitness suggestibility and memory for source

Ackil, Jennifer K., Zaragoza, Maria S.·1995·Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Abstract

To what extent do children who report suggested information believe they actually remember seeing the suggested details they report? Asking whether children misremember seeing suggested items is in essence a question about children's ability to monitor the source of their memories. The current study reports the results of two experiments designed to assess potential age-related changes in subjects' ability to accurately monitor the source of suggested information either immediately or following a 1-week delay. The results of both experiments revealed that although all subjects claimed to remember seeing suggested items, the magnitude of this effect varied with age such that first-graders made more source confusions than third- and fifth-graders, who in turn made more confusions than college subjects. Our findings suggest that these age differences are not simply a function of more general age-related memory or performance deficits, but instead reflect developmental differences in the tendency to confuse suggested information for actually witnessed events.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jecp.1995.1031

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Preadolescents may be more suggestible than older adolescents.

    “Because preadolescents may be more suggestible than older adolescents,16 there is concern that they might internalize the idea of suicide simply because it was mentioned in a screening, even if they had not previously considered it.17”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ackil, J. K., & Zaragoza, M. S.
Affiliations
  • Gustavus Adolphus College (US)
  • Kent State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-08
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
57-83
ISSN
0022-0965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089122366
Cited by
202
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh047858-03)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH47858)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
eyewitness suggestibility, source monitoring, source confusion, children's memory, age differences, developmental differences, memory distortion, eyewitness testimony
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Reality Testing, Mental Recall, Retention, Psychology, Suggestion, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review