Cited by 37Memory Processes and InfluencesDeception detection and forensic psychologyIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

Developmental Reversals in False Memory: A New Look at the Reliability of Children’s Evidence

Brainerd, C. J.·2013·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

Classic research that was initiated in response to heavy reliance on children’s evidence in certain types of criminal cases showed that the incidence of false memories declines steadily between childhood and young adulthood. This developmental decline pattern became the centerpiece of much expert testimony, and it has been treated as settled science in court rulings. It is not settled science. A large number of studies have recently appeared on developmental reversals, an opposite pattern in which false memories for events that preserve the gist of experience increase dramatically between early childhood and young adulthood. Developmental reversals challenge the forensic principle that children’s evidence is inherently more infected with false memories than adults’ evidence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0963721413484468

Cites

164 of 164 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brainerd, C. J.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Brainerd, C. J.
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2013-09-25
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
335-341
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2041546165
Cited by
37
References
164
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
false memory, child testimony, expert testimony, forensic psychology, memory distortion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review