The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phoneme Awareness Is a Better Predictor of Early Reading Skill Than Onset-Rime Awareness
Open accessAbstract
We present the results of a short-term longitudinal study. Children in the early stages of learning to read (5 and 6 year olds) were administered three different tasks (deletion, oddity, and detection) tapping awareness of four phonological units (initial phoneme, final phoneme, onset, and rime). Measures of phoneme awareness were the best concurrent and longitudinal predictors of reading skill with onset-rime skills making no additional predictive contribution once phonemic skills were accounted for. The findings are related to recent controversy over the role of large versus small phonological units as predictors of children's reading skills.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills
Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.192 · Cited by 3,303
Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains.
Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.1.56 · Cited by 2,698
Development of young readers' phonological processing abilities.
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Laughon, P., Simmons, K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1993) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.1.83 · Cited by 516
Cited by
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3 · Cited by 2,871
Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M. J., & Stevenson, J. (2004) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.665 · Cited by 1,084
Self-citationBeyond phonological skills: broader language skills contribute to the development of reading
Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (2004) · Journal of Research in Reading · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2004.00238.x · Cited by 669
Self-citationMelby-Lervåg, M., & Lervåg, A. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0033890 · Cited by 363
Caravolas, M., Volín, J., & Hulme, C. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2005.04.003 · Cited by 295
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hulme, C., Hatcher, P. J., Nation, K., Brown, A., Adams, J., & Stuart, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2-28
- ISSN
- 0022-0965 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965551285
- Cited by
- 427
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 37.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phoneme Awareness Is a Better Predictor of Early Reading Skill Than Onset-Rime Awareness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/jecp.2002.2670
- The paper
- Hulme, C., Hatcher, P. J., Nation, K., Brown, A., Adams, J., & Stuart, G. (2002). Phoneme Awareness Is a Better Predictor of Early Reading Skill Than Onset-Rime Awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.2002.2670
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
