Cited by 334Categorization, perception, and languageLanguage, Metaphor, and CognitionSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Splitting the Differences: A Structural Alignment View of Similarity

Markman, A.B., Gentner, D.·1993·Journal of Memory and Language

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jmla.1993.1027

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Venue
Journal of Memory and Language
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-08
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
517-535
ISSN
0749-596X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079783775
Cited by
334
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 16
FWCI
9.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
similarity judgments, structural alignment, conceptual structure, word pair similarity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review