Cited by 287Memory Processes and InfluencesCategorization, perception, and languageFace Recognition and Perception

The Misremembrance of Wines Past: Verbal and Perceptual Expertise Differentially Mediate Verbal Overshadowing of Taste Memory

Melcher, Joseph M., Schooler, Jonathan W.·1996·Journal of Memory and Language

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jmla.1996.0013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Melcher, J. M., & Schooler, J. W.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Journal of Memory and Language
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-04
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
231-245
ISSN
0749-596X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2012839591
Cited by
287
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 14
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
verbal overshadowing, taste memory, wine tasting, perceptual expertise, verbalization, domain-specific expertise, wine experts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review