Cited by 486Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceMemory Processes and InfluencesFree Will and Agency

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Re-representing consciousness: dissociations between experience and meta-consciousness

Schooler, Jonathan W.·2002·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

A distinction is drawn between non-conscious (unexperienced), conscious (experienced), and meta-conscious (re-represented) mental processes. There is evidence for two types of dissociations between consciousness and meta-consciousness, the latter being defined as the intermittent explicit re-representation of the contents of consciousness. Temporal dissociations occur when an individual, who previously lacked meta-consciousness about the contents of consciousness, directs meta-consciousness towards those contents; for example, catching one's mind wandering during reading. Once meta-consciousness is triggered, translation dissociations can occur if the re-representation process misrepresents the original experience, such as when one verbally reflects on non-verbal experiences or takes stock of subtle or ambiguous experiences.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1364-6613(02)01949-6

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 62 references

2 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Schooler, J.W. et al. (in press) Zoning-out during reading: evidence for dissociations between experience and meta-consciousness. In Visual Meta-Cognition: Thinking about Seeing (Levin, D., ed.), Praeger
  2. Schooler, J.W. et al. (in press) The pursuit and monitoring of happiness can be self-defeating. In Psychology and Economics (Carrillo, J. and Brocas, I., eds), Oxford University Press
  3. Cicogna, 2001, Consciousness during dreams, Conscious. Cogn., 10, 26, 10.1006/ccog.2000.0471 · DOI
  4. Tzelgov, 1999, Automatic but conscious: that is how we act most of the time, Am. Psychol., 54, 217

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 486

Metadata

Authors
Schooler, J. W.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Schooler, Jonathan W.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-08
Volume
6
Issue
8
Pages
339-344
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970099525
Cited by
485
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 13
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fetzer Institute
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Free Will and Agency
Keywords
meta-consciousness, consciousness, re-representation, temporal dissociation, mind wandering, subjective experience, metacognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review