Cited by 286Education, Achievement, and GiftednessCareer Development and DiversityMathematics Education and Pedagogy

Latent Structure of the Sources of Mathematics Self-Efficacy

Lent, Robert W., Lopez, Frederick G., Brown, Steven D., Gore, Jr., Paul A.·1996·Journal of Vocational Behavior

Abstract

General social cognitive theory and its career-specific elaborations posit four primary sources through which self-efficacy beliefs are acquired and modified: personal performance accomplishments, vicarious learning, social persuasion, and physiological states and reactions. We present two studies exploring the dimensionality of these sources within the context of career-relevant mathematics activities. In Study 1, 295 college students completed measures of the source variables. Testing two- through five-factor models, we found strongest support for a four-factor latent structure of the efficacy sources. In Study 2, involving 481 high school students, a five-factor model fit the data well. We also found evidence of a higher order factor structure in both samples. Several directions for further research on the sources of efficacy information are considered, along with implications for career and academic interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jvbe.1996.0045

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social cognitive career theory (SCCT) explains how learning experiences influence the development of education and career choice and achievement through cognitive factors, including self-efficacy and outcome expectations.

    “SCCT explains how learning experiences influence the development of education and career choice and achievement through cognitive factors, including self-efficacy and outcome expectations.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lent, R. W., Lopez, F. G., Brown, S. D., & Gore, Jr.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Loyola University Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Lent, Robert W.
Venue
Journal of Vocational Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-12
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
292-308
ISSN
0001-8791 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009880757
Cited by
286
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Vocational Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
mathematics self-efficacy, latent structure, social cognitive theory, observational learning, social persuasion, physiological state, mastery experiences, university students, high school students, higher-order factor structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review