Cited by 67Neuroscience and Music PerceptionMultisensory perception and integrationTactile and Sensory Interactions

Mind's Ear in a Musician: Where and When in the Brain

Schürmann, Martin, Raij, Tommi, Fujiki, Nobuya, Hari, Riitta·2002·NeuroImage

Abstract

The temporospatial pattern of brain activity during auditory imagery was studied using magnetoencephalography. Trained musicians were presented with visual notes and instructed to imagine the corresponding sounds. Brain activity specific to the auditory imagery task was observed, first as enhanced activity of left and right occipital areas (average onset 120-150 ms after the onset of the visual stimulus) and then spreading to the midline parietal cortex (precuneus) and to such extraoccipital areas that were not activated during the visual control condition (e.g., the left temporal auditory association cortex and the left and right premotor cortices). The latest activations, with average onset latencies of 270-400 ms clearly separate from the earliest ones, occurred in the left sensorimotor cortex and the right inferotemporal visual association cortex. These data imply a complex temporospatial activation sequence of multiple cortical areas when musicians recall firmly established audiovisual associations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/nimg.2002.1098

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Auditory imagery and perception show similar neural responses, matching fMRI findings of shared substrates.

    “The resemblance of neural responses in auditory imagery and auditory perception (Experiments 3–5) agrees with findings that similar neural substrates mediate auditory perception and imagery in fMRI studies (Zatorre et al., 1996; Wheeler et al., 2000; Schürmann et al., 2002; Halpern et al., 2004; Aleman et al., 2005; Bunzeck et al., 2005; Zatorre et al., 2009).”

    From Mental imagery of speech and movement implicates the dynamics of internal forward models (2010) · cites this paper as Schürmann et al., 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schürmann, M., Raij, T., Fujiki, N., & Hari, R.
Affiliations
University of Lübeck (DE)
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-06
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
434-440
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016580552
Cited by
67
References
21
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
auditory imagery, musicians, occipital cortex, precuneus, parietal cortex, premotor cortex, sensorimotor cortex, inferotemporal cortex, hemispheric lateralization
MeSH terms
Adult, Auditory Cortex, Auditory Pathways, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Music, Occipital Lobe, Parietal Lobe, Reaction Time, Mental Recall, Visual Cortex, Magnetoencephalography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review