Context, Cognition, and Common Method Variance: Psychometric and Verbal Protocol Evidence

Harrison, David A., McLaughlin, Mary E., Coalter, Terry M.·1996·Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

DOI 10.1006/obhd.1996.0103

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/obhd.1996.0103

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452 · Cited by 15,744
Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs
Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114 · Cited by 8,490
Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425 · Cited by 5,942
Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing
Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002 · Cited by 5,435
Self-citation
Common methods variance detection in business research
Fuller, C. M., Simmering, M. J., Atinc, G., Atinc, Y., & Babin, B. J. (2016) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.008 · Cited by 3,519
Common method bias: It’ s bad, it’ s complex, it’ s widespread, and it’ s not easy to fix
Podsakoff, P. M., Podsakoff, N. P., Williams, L. J., Huang, C., & Yang, J. (2024) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-040030 · Cited by 1,899
A Tale of Three Perspectives: Examining Post Hoc Statistical Techniques for Detection and Correction of Common Method Variance
Richardson, H. A., Simmering, M. J., & Sturman, M. C. (2009) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428109332834 · Cited by 1,721
How Important are Job Attitudes? Meta-Analytic Comparisons of Integrative Behavioral Outcomes and Time Sequences
Harrison, D. A., Newman, D. A., & Roth, P. L. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.20786077 · Cited by 1,245
Self-citation
Marker Variable Choice, Reporting, and Interpretation in the Detection of Common Method Variance: A Review and Demonstration
Simmering, M. J., Fuller, C. M., Richardson, H. A., Ocal, Y., & Atinc, G. M. (2015) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428114560023 · Cited by 734
The phenomenology of fit: Linking the person and environment to the subjective experience of person-environment fit.
Edwards, J. R., Cable, D. M., Williamson, I. O., Lambert, L. S., & Shipp, A. J. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.802 · Cited by 659
TIME, TEAMS, AND TASK PERFORMANCE: CHANGING EFFECTS OF SURFACE- AND DEEP-LEVEL DIVERSITY ON GROUP FUNCTIONING.
Price, K. H., Harrison, D. A., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/3069328 · Cited by 583
Self-citation
Classroom climate and children's academic and psychological wellbeing: A systematic review and meta- analysis
Wang, M.-T., L. Degol, J., Amemiya, J., Parr, A., & Guo, J. (2020) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2020.100912 · Cited by 470
Common Method Variance in Advertising Research: When to Be Concerned and How to Control for It
Malhotra, N. K., Schaller, T. K., & Patil, A. (2017) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2016.1252287 · Cited by 312
What Drives Key Informant Accuracy?
Homburg, C., Klarmann, M., Reimann, M., & Schilke, O. (2012) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.09.0174 · Cited by 276
The development of the general factor of psychopathology “p factor” through childhood and adolescence
Murray, A. L., Eisner, M., & Ribeaud, D. (2016) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10802-016-0132-1 · Cited by 192
Risk Area Residents’ Perceptions and Adoption of Seismic Hazard Adjustments1
Lindell, M. K., & Prater, C. S. (2002) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01868.x · Cited by 132
Perceptions of Discrimination and Justice Among Employees with Disabilities
Snyder, L. A., Carmichael, J. S., Blackwell, L. V., Cleveland, J. N., & Thornton, G. C. (2010) · Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal · doi:10.1007/s10672-009-9107-5 · Cited by 128
Can data-driven precision marketing promote user ad clicks? Evidence from advertising in WeChat moments
Yu, C., Zhang, Z., Lin, C., & Wu, Y. J. (2020) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.05.001 · Cited by 124
Entrepreneurial leadership, strategic flexibility, and venture performance: does founders’ span of control matter?
Hensellek, S., Kleine-Stegemann, L., & Kollmann, T. (2023) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113544 · Cited by 94
A systematic review of interventions to address workplace bias: What we know, what we don't, and lessons learned
Metinyurt, T., Haynes-Baratz, M. C., & Bond, M. A. (2021) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2021.100879 · Cited by 48
The effects of analytics capability and sensing capability on operations performance: the moderating role of data-driven culture
Wong, D. T. W., & Ngai, E. W. T. (2025) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-023-05241-5 · Cited by 39

Authors: Harrison, D. A., McLaughlin, M. E., & Coalter, T. M.
Venue: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 1996-12
Volume: 68
Issue: 3
Pages: 246-261
ISSN: 0749-5978 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1996.0103
OpenAlex: W2049030568
Cited by: 429
References: 0
FWCI: 0.00
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review