Cited by 109Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsHuman-Automation Interaction and SafetyDecision Support System Applications

The Influence of Decision Aids on User Behavior: Implications for Knowledge Acquisition and Inappropriate Reliance

Open access
Glover, Steven M, Prawitt, Douglas F, Spilker, Brian C·1997·Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/obhd.1997.2735

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Alter, S. L. (1980). Current practice and continuing challenges. Addison-Welsey Publishing Com- pany, Reading, MA.
  2. Ballew, V. (1982). Technological routineness and intra unit structure in CPA firms. The Accounting Review, January, 88-104.
  3. Bamber, E. M. & Bylinski, J. (1982). The audit team and the audit review process: An organizational approach. Journal of Accounting Literature, 1, 33-58.
  4. Bamber, E. M. & Snowball, D. (1988). An experimental study of the effects of audit structure in uncertain task environments. The Accounting Review, July, 490-504.
  5. Bonner, S. E. & Walker, P. L. (1994). Effects of instruction and experience on the acquisition of knowledge. The Accounting Review, January, 157-178.
  6. Elliott, R., & Jacobson, P. (1987, May). Audit technology: A heritage and a promise. Journal of Accountancy, pp. 198-218.
  7. Jiambalvo, J., & Waller, W. (1984, Spring). Decomposition and assessment of audit risk. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, pp. 80-88.
  8. Kachelmeier, S. J., & Messier, W. (1990, January). An investigation of the influence of a nonstatisti- cal decision aid on auditor sample size decisions. The Accounting Review, pp. 209-226.
  9. Kottemann, J. E., & Remus, W. E. (1991). The effects of decision support systems on performance. In H. G. Sol & J. Vecsenyi (Eds), Environments for supporting decision processes (pp. 203-214). New York: North-Holland.
  10. Messier, W., (1995). Research in and development of audit decision aids. In R. H. Ashton & A. H. Ashton (Eds.), Judgment and decision making in accounting and auditing. (pp. 207-228). Cambridge University Press.
  11. Messier, W., & Hansen, J. V. (1987). Expert systems in auditing: The state of the art. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 7, 94-105.
  12. Prawitt, D. F., (1995). Staffing assignments for judgment-oriented audit tasks: The effects of structured audit technology and environment. The Accounting Review, July, 443-465.
  13. Simon, H. A., Discussion: Cognition and social behaviour. (1976). In J. S. Carroll & J. W. Payne (Eds.). Cognition and social Behaviour (pp. 253-267). Hillsdale: Earlbaum.
  14. Todd, P., & Benbasat, I. (1992): An experimental investigation of the impact of computer bases decision aids on processing effort. MIS Quarterly, 16, 373-393.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glover, S. M., Prawitt, D. F., & Spilker, B. C.
Affiliations
Brigham Young University (US)
Venue
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-11
Volume
72
Issue
2
Pages
232-255
ISSN
0749-5978 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079306714
Cited by
108
References
57
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Brigham Young University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Decision Support System Applications
Keywords
decision aids, knowledge acquisition, on-the-job learning, expertise development, judgment accuracy, organizational decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review