Cited by 552Life Cycle Costing AnalysisCapital Investment and Risk AnalysisEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability

The life cycle costing (LCC) approach: a conceptual discussion of its usefulness for environmental decision-making

Open access
Gluch, Pernilla, Baumann, Henrikke·2004·Building and Environment

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.buildenv.2003.10.008

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is not a linear relationship between cost and environmental impact.

    “there is not a linear relationship between cost and environmental impact, as discussed in the literature, e.g., [60][61][62].”

    From Is Prolonging the Lifetime of Passive Durable Products a Low-Hanging Fruit of a Circular Economy? A Multiple Case Study (2019) · cites this paper as [62]

    Section 3.4, “A monetary unit” (page unavailable), says that monetary calculations omit some environmentally related costs and that a single monetary figure cannot capture every aspect of a complex environmental problem. This supports the broader point that cost is an incomplete guide to environmental impact, but the paper does not establish the specific claim that their relationship is non-linear. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Hamner B, Stinson CH. Managerial accounting and environmental compliance costs. Journal of Cost Management 1995;9(2):4-10.
  2. Kite D. Capital budgeting: integrating environmental impact. Journal of Cost Management 1995;9(2):11-4.
  3. Bennett M, James P. Environment-related management accounting: current practice and future trends. Greener Management International 1997;97(17):32-52.
  4. Sterner E. Green procurement of buildings: estimation of life-cycle cost and environmental impact. Ph.D. dissertation thesis, Department of Mining Engineering, Lule a University of Technology, 2002.
  5. Hogarth R. Judgement and choice, (2nd ed.). Chicago: Wiley; 1994.
  6. Wycherley I. Environmental managers and accounting. Journal of Applied Management Studies 1997;6(2):169-85.
  7. Zaring O. Capital budgeting and the environment. Ph.D. dissertation thesis, School of Economics and Commercial Law. G oteborg: university of G oteborg, Sweden, 1999.
  8. Str omgren C, Hantering av os akerhet och risk vid fastighetsekonomiska beslut. Licentiate thesis, G oteborg, Sweden: Department of Building Economics and Construction Management, Chalmers University of Technology, 1995.
  9. Bazerman M. Judgement in managerial decisions, (4th ed.). New York: Wiley; 1998.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gluch, P., & Baumann, H.
Affiliations
Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
Corresponding author
Gluch, Pernilla
Venue
Building and Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-05
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
571-580
ISSN
0360-1323 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003534703
Cited by
552
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 11
FWCI
28.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Building and Environment (publishedVersion)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Stiftelsen för Miljöstrategisk Forskning
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Life Cycle Costing Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Keywords
life cycle cost analysis, environmental decision-making, environmental accounting, construction industry, irreversible decisions, intergenerational equity, decision making under uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review