The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ontologies Are Us: A Unified Model of Social Networks and Semantics
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S. S., & Faust, K. (1994) · Cited by 17,961
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557
WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database
Kilgarriff, A., & Fellbaum, C. (2000) · Language · doi:10.2307/417141 · Cited by 11,464
Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition
Lazega, E., & Burt, R. S. (1995) · Revue Française de Sociologie · doi:10.2307/3322456 · Cited by 7,853
Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing?
Gruber, T. R. (1995) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.1995.1081 · Cited by 7,753
Pajek - Program for Large Network Analysis
Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (1999) · Cited by 1,414
Sesame: A Generic Architecture for Storing and Querying RDF and RDF Schema
Broekstra, J., Kampman, A., & van Harmelen, F. (2002) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-48005-6_7 · Cited by 1,338
Formal ontology, conceptual analysis and knowledge representation
Guarino, N. (1995) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.1995.1066 · Cited by 1,197
Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition.
Andrews, S. B., & Burt, R. S. (1995) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393644 · Cited by 988
WordNet an electronic lexical database
Fellbaum, C. (n.d.) · Cited by 771
Cited by
Information Retrieval in Folksonomies: Search and Ranking
Hotho, A., Jäschke, R., Schmitz, C., & Stumme, G. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11762256_31 · Cited by 845
Community detection in Social Media: Performance and application considerations
Papadopoulos, S., Kompatsiaris, Y., Vakali, A., & Spyridonos, P. (2012) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-011-0224-z · Cited by 615
Collective knowledge systems: Where the Social Web meets the Semantic Web
Gruber, T. (2008) · Journal of Web Semantics · doi:10.1016/j.websem.2007.11.011 · Cited by 606
Evaluating similarity measures for emergent semantics of social tagging
Markines, B., Cattuto, C., Menczer, F., Benz, D., Hotho, A., & Stumme, G. (2009) · Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web · doi:10.1145/1526709.1526796 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Mika, P.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2005
- Pages
- 522-536
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1630954580
- Cited by
- 663
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 46.27
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ontologies Are Us: A Unified Model of Social Networks and Semantics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/11574620_38
- The paper
- Mika, P. (2005). Ontologies Are Us: A Unified Model of Social Networks and Semantics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/11574620_38
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
