Cited by 350Machine Learning and AlgorithmsGaussian Processes and Bayesian InferenceMachine Learning and ELM

Inductive Confidence Machines for Regression

Papadopoulos, Harris, Proedrou, Kostas, Vovk, Volodya, Gammerman, Alex·2002·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/3-540-36755-1_29

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Split conformal prediction (SCP) offers distribution-free, model-agnostic guarantees on ground-truth coverage, assuming data exchangeability.

    “SCP offers distribution-free, model-agnostic guarantees on groundtruth coverage, assuming data exchangeability.”

    From Conformal Lesion Segmentation for 3D Medical Images (2025) · cites this paper as Papadopoulos et al. 2002

  • The procedure guarantees that at a user-chosen confidence level 1-α, the inner mask contains at most a user-specified fraction τ of false-positive pixels.

    “Our procedure, based on inductive (or 'split') Conformal Prediction (CP) [21, 15], guarantees that at a user-chosen confidence level 1 -α , the inner mask contains at most a userspecified fraction τ of false-positive pixels.”
  • Split CP constructs distribution-free prediction sets with finite-sample guarantees of containing the true target at a user-specified confidence level 1-α.

    “Split CP [15] constructs distribution-free prediction sets with finite-sample guarantees of containing the true target at a user-specified confidence level 1 -α .”
  • CP provides marginal frequentist guarantees on the mask-level procedure, rather than on individual pixels.

    “Importantly, CP provides marginal frequentist guarantees on the mask-level procedure , rather than on individual pixels”
  • The method builds on the standard inductive CP framework.

    “Our method builds on the standard inductive CP framework [15].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papadopoulos, H., Proedrou, K., Vovk, V., & Gammerman, A.
Affiliations
Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2002
Pages
345-356
ISSN
0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1499689786
Cited by
346
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 73 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.54
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and ELM
Keywords
confidence estimation, regression analysis, inductive reasoning, transductive inference, ridge regression, computational efficiency, large data sets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review