PreprintCited by 239Statistical Methods and InferenceForecasting Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models

Conformalized Quantile Regression

Open access
Romano, Yaniv, Patterson, Evan, Candès, Emmanuel J.·2019·arXiv

Abstract

Conformal prediction is a technique for constructing prediction intervals that attain valid coverage in finite samples, without making distributional assumptions. Despite this appeal, existing conformal methods can be unnecessarily conservative because they form intervals of constant or weakly varying length across the input space. In this paper we propose a new method that is fully adaptive to heteroscedasticity. It combines conformal prediction with classical quantile regression, inheriting the advantages of both. We establish a theoretical guarantee of valid coverage, supplemented by extensive experiments on popular regression datasets. We compare the efficiency of conformalized quantile regression to other conformal methods, showing that our method tends to produce shorter intervals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1905.03222

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CQR maintains the coverage guarantee of conformal prediction while often producing tighter, more locally adaptive intervals compared to residual-based methods, particularly in heteroscedastic settings.

    “This approach maintains the coverage guarantee of CP while often producing tighter, more locally adaptive intervals compared to residual-based methods, particularly in heteroscedastic settings [8].”

    From ConfIC-RCA: Statistically Grounded Efficient Estimation of Segmentation Quality (2025) · cites this paper as [8]

  • Conformal RCA leverages split conformal prediction to produce statistically grounded confidence intervals for segmentation quality scores.

    “At the core of our approach is Conformal RCA , which leverages split conformal prediction [6]-[8] to produce statistically grounded confidence intervals for segmentation quality scores.”

    From ConfIC-RCA: Statistically Grounded Efficient Estimation of Segmentation Quality (2025) · cites this paper as [8]

  • Assuming exchangeability between the test sample and calibration set, the constructed interval provides the marginal coverage guarantee stated in Theorem 3.

    “Assuming exchangeability between the test sample and calibration set, the constructed interval provides the marginal coverage guarantee stated in Theorem 3, as shown in [8].”

    From ConfIC-RCA: Statistically Grounded Efficient Estimation of Segmentation Quality (2025) · cites this paper as [8]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [7][7] Harris Papadopoulos, Alex Gammerman, and Volodya Vovk. Normalized nonconformity measures for regression conformal prediction. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Applications , pages 64-69, 2008. -
  2. [20][20] James W. Taylor. A quantile regression neural network approach to estimating the conditional density of multiperiod returns. Journal of Forecasting , 19(4):299-311, 2000. -
  3. [35][35] Nitish Srivastava, Geoffrey E. Hinton, Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. Journal of Machine Learning Research , 15(1):1929-1958, 2014. -
  4. [37][37] Victor Chernozhukov, Iván Fernández-Val, and Alfred Galichon. Quantile and probability curves without crossing. Econometrica , 78(3):1093-1125, 2010. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Romano, Y., Patterson, E., & Candès, E. J.
Affiliations
  • Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
Volume
32
Pages
3538-3548
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2946063682
Cited by
236
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • ISEF Foundation
  • Iran Science Elites Federation
  • Office of Naval Research (N00014-16-1-2712, N00014)
  • Army Research Office (W911NF-17, W911NF-17-1-0304, W911NF)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
Keywords
conformal prediction, quantile regression, prediction intervals, heteroscedasticity, coverage guarantees, interval length, nonparametric inference, conformalized quantile regression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review