Cited by 217Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityBlockchain Technology in Education and LearningCryptography and Data Security

MIStore: a Blockchain-Based Medical Insurance Storage System

Open access
Zhou, Lijing, Wang, Licheng, Sun, Yiru·2018·Journal of Medical Systems

Abstract

Currently, blockchain technology, which is decentralized and may provide tamper-resistance to recorded data, is experiencing exponential growth in industry and research. In this paper, we propose the MIStore, a blockchain-based medical insurance storage system. Due to blockchain's the property of tamper-resistance, MIStore may provide a high-credibility to users. In a basic instance of the system, there are a hospital, patient, insurance company and n servers. Specifically, the hospital performs a (t, n)-threshold MIStore protocol among the n servers. For the protocol, any node of the blockchain may join the protocol to be a server if the node and the hospital wish. Patient's spending data is stored by the hospital in the blockchain and is protected by the n servers. Any t servers may help the insurance company to obtain a sum of a part of the patient's spending data, which servers can perform homomorphic computations on. However, the n servers cannot learn anything from the patient's spending data, which recorded in the blockchain, forever as long as more than n - t servers are honest. Besides, because most of verifications are performed by record-nodes and all related data is stored at the blockchain, thus the insurance company, servers and the hospital only need small memory and CPU. Finally, we deploy the MIStore on the Ethererum blockchain and give the corresponding performance evaluation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10916-018-0996-4

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior literature suggested recommendations including extending/replicating frameworks and developing targeted treatment solutions.

    “Prior literature has suggested various recommendations for future research, including extending (e.g.Zhou et al., 2018) or replicating current frameworks (e.g.Quaini et al., 2018), and developing targeted treatment solutions (e.g.Mamoshina et al., 2018), to name a few.”

    From Blockchain in healthcare: A systematic literature review, synthesizing framework and future research agenda (2020) · cites this paper as Zhou et al., 2018

    The Background section says the authors extend Shamir’s secret sharing in MIStore, but describes work they performed, not a recommendation for future research. The Performance evaluation section suggests that another blockchain or improved code might improve the prototype; it does not specifically recommend extending an existing framework. The other recommendations in the citing sentence are attributed to other sources, not Zhou et al. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Prior studies attended to the need for improvements in data processing.

    “Furthermore, prior studies have also attended to the need for improvements in data processing (e.g.Zhou et al., 2018).”
  • Prior studies addressed authentic data mobilization, avoidance of data leakage or double spending on storage, and perpetual data preservation.

    “For instance, prior studies have addressed issues pertaining to authentic data mobilization (Brogan et al., 2018), avoidance of data leakage (Zhang et al., 2016;Zhou et al., 2018) or double spending on storage (Rahmadika & Rhee, 2019), and perpetual data preservation (H.Li et al., 2018).”
  • Scholars have focused on storage and preservation of sensitive data from sources such as medical devices and medical insurance.

    “With the increasing inter-institutional adoption of blockchain, scholars have also focused on the issue of storage and preservation of sensitive data (Al Omar et al., 2019) from different sources such as medical devices (Firdaus et al., 2018), and medical insurance (Zhou et al., 2018).”
  • Using permissioned consortium blockchain or platforms other than Ethereum may improve current architectures for blockchain in healthcare.

    “For example, utilization of permissioned consortium blockchain (Zhang et al., 2018) or platforms other than Ethereum (Zhou et al., 2018;Rahmadika & Rhee, 2018) may improve current architectures being used to deploy blockchain in healthcare ecosystem.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [9]Bentov, I., Lee, C., Mizrahi, A., and Rosenfeld, M.: Proof of activity Extending bitcoin’s proof of work via proof of stake. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMETRICS 2014 Workshop on Economics of Networked Systems, NetEcon. 2, 2014.
  2. [16]Dwork, C., and Naor, M.: Pricing via processing or combatting junk mail. In: CRYPTO’92, pp. 139–147, 1992.
  3. [19]Ferrer, E. C.: The blockchain: A new framework for robotic swarm systems. arXiv: 1608.00695, 2016 · arXiv
  4. [20]Brambilla, G., Amoretti, M., and Zanichelli, F.: Using block chain for peer-to-peer proof-of-location. arXiv: 1607.00174, 2016 · arXiv
  5. [29]Ekblaw, A., Azaria, A., Halamka, J. D., et al.: A Case Study for Blockchain in Healthcare: “MedRec” prototype for electronic health records and medical research data[C]. In: Proceedings of IEEE Open and Big Data Conference, Vol. 13, p. 13, 2016.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, L., Wang, L., & Sun, Y.
Affiliations
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Licheng
Venue
Journal of Medical Systems
Published
2018-07-02
Volume
42
Issue
8
Pages
149-149
ISSN
  • 0148-5598 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-689X
OpenAlex
W2810711254
Cited by
217
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 3
FWCI
34.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61502048)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
Keywords
blockchain, health insurance, data storage, threshold secret sharing, privacy preservation, tamper resistance, Ethereum, secure multi-party computation
MeSH terms
Humans, Insurance, Health, Research, Technology, Information Storage and Retrieval, Computer Security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review