CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 479Spatial Cognition and NavigationData Visualization and AnalyticsUrban Design and Spatial Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Nature of Landmarks for Real and Electronic Spaces

Sorrows, Molly E., Hirtle, Stephen C.·1999·Lecture Notes in Computer Science
DOI 10.1007/3-540-48384-5_3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/3-540-48384-5_3

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Ark, W., Dryer, D.C., Selker, T., and Zhai, S. (1998), Landmarks to aid navigation in a graphical user interface. Workshop on Personalised and Social Navigation in Information Space. Stockholm March pp16–17, 1998. (In association with IFIP working group WG 13.2). Available from: http://www.sics.se/humle/projects/persona/web/workshop/
  2. Byrne, M. D., John, B. E., Wehrle, N. S., The effects of subdividing macrospatial experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 120–132. · DOI
  3. Golledge, R. G. (1999b), Human wayfinding and cognitive maps. In R. G. Golledge (Ed.), Wayfinding behavior: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes (pp. 5–45). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Lynch, K. (1960), The Image of the City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  5. Maglio, P. P. and Barrett, R. (1997), On the trail of information searchers. Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  6. Remolina, E. and Kuipers, B. (1998), Towards a formalization of the spatial semantic hierarchy. Fourth Symposium on Logical Formalizations of Commonsense Reasoning (Common Sense 98). London, England, 7-9 January 1998.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 479

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Sorrows, M. E., & Hirtle, S. C.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
ORCID
Hirtle, Stephen C.
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published
1999
Pages
37-50
ISSN
0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1007/3-540-48384-5_3
OpenAlex
W1544772936
Cited by
478
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 24
FWCI
7.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
Keywords
landmarks, cognitive maps, information space, hypertext, spatial recognition, visual landmarks, environmental design, physical space, digital space

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review