Cited by 129Nursing Diagnosis and DocumentationNursing education and managementInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

Infrastructure and Organizational Transformation: Classifying Nurses’ Work

Bowker, Geoffrey C., Timmermans, Stefan, Star, Susan Leigh·1996·IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-0-387-34872-8_21

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bowker, G. C., Timmermans, S., & Star, S. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Brandeis University (US)
Venue
IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology
Publisher
Springer US
Published
1996
Pages
344-370
ISSN
  • 1868-422X (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-4238
OpenAlex
W123915039
Cited by
129
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
21.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IFIP advances in information and communication technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
Nursing Interventions Classification, nursing interventions, International Classification of Diseases, classification systems, organizational infrastructure, organizational change, comparability, control, visibility, organizational coordination, nursing knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review