Cited by 10

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Early Regional Polities of Coastal Ecuador

Masucci, Maria A.·2008·The Handbook of South American Archaeology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-0-387-74907-5_25

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The initial morphological similarity with other Manteño-Huancavilca settlements and areas can be assumed as a reliable first indicator of hierarchical societies linked to broad commercial networks with specific craft productions and communal organization.

    “La inicial similitud morfológica con otros asentamientos y áreas de la cultura Manteña-Huancavilca (Masucci, 2008), puede ser asumida como un primer indicador fiable para hablar de sociedades jerarquizadas, vinculadas a amplias redes comerciales en las que se integran producciones artesanales específicas, pero en las que también jugará un papel fundamental la organización de tipo comunal.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Bouchard, Jean F., 1995, Arqueología de la costa del Pacifico Nor-Equatorial. Evaluación preliminar de los cambios ocurridos en los últimos decenios. In Primer Encuentro de Investigadores de la Costa Ecuatoriana en Europa, edited by Aurelio Alvarez, Silvia G. Alvarez, Carmen Fauría, and Jorge G. Marcos, pp. 67–95. Ediciones Abya-Yala, Quito.
  2. Bushnell, G. H. S., 1951, The Archaeology of the Santa Elena Peninsula in Southwest Ecuador. Occasional Papers of the Cambridge University Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, No. 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  3. Cardenas-Arroyo, Felipe, 1996, Complex societies in prehispanic Colombia: the Tairona as case study. In Chieftains, Power and Trade: Regional Interaction in the Intermediate Area of the Americas, edited by Carl H. Langebaek and Felipe Cardenas-Arroyo, pp. 63–74. Departamento de Antropología, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
  4. Cummins, Tom, 1992, Tradition in Ecuadorian pre-Hispanic art. The ceramics of Chorrera and Jama-Coaque. In Amerindian Signs. 5, 000 Years of Precolumbian Art in Ecuador, edited by Francisco Valdez and Diego Veintimilla, pp. 63–81. Dinediciones, Quito.
  5. Cummins, Tom, 1994, La tradición de figurinas de la costa ecuatoriana: Estilo tecnológico y el uso de moldes. In Tecnología y Organización de la Cerámica Prehispánica en los Andes, edited by Izumi Shimada, pp. 157–172. Fondo Editorial, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima.
  6. Cummins, Tom, Julio Burgos Cabrera, and Carlos Mora Hoyos, 1996, Arte prehispanico del Ecuador. Huellas del pasado: los sellos de Jama-Coaque. Miscelanea Antropológica Ecuatoriana Serie Monográfica, No. 11. Banco Central del Ecuador, Guayaquil.
  7. Dorsey, George A., 1901, Archaeological Investigations on the Island of La Plata, Ecuador. Field Columbian Museum, Publication 56, Chicago. · DOI
  8. Drennan, Robert D. and Carlos A. Uribe (eds.), 1987, Chiefdoms in the Americas. University Press of America, Lanham, MD.
  9. Estrada, Emilio, 1957, Prehistoria de Manabí. Museo Victor Emilio Estrada, Publicación 4. Guayaquil.
  10. Estrada, Emilio, 1962, Arqueología de Manabí Central. Museo Victor Emilio Estrada, Publicación 7. Guayaquil.
  11. Guinea, Mercedes 1995, Diferentes mecanismos de articulación hombre-entorno en la costa norte del Ecuador: La desembocadura del Esmeraldas del principio de nuestra era al año 1527. In Primer Encuentro de Investigadores de la Costa Ecuatoriana en Europa, edited by Aurelio Alvarez, Silvia G. Alvarez, Carmen Fauría and Jorge G. Marcos, pp. 47–66. Ediciones Abya-Yala, Quito.
  12. Hosler, Dorothy, 1994, The Sounds and Colors of Power. The Sacred Metallurgical Technology of Ancient West Mexico. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  13. Jijón y Caamaño, Jacinto, [1952] 1997, Antropología Prehispánica del Ecuador. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito.
  14. Lavallée, Daniele, 1992, Preface. In Amerindian Signs. 5, 000 Years of Precolumbian Art in Ecuador, edited by Francisco Valdez and Diego Veintimilla, pp. 7–11. Dinediciones, Quito.
  15. Marcos, Jorge G., 1986, Breve prehistoria del Ecuador. In Arqueología de la Costa Ecuatoriana: Nuevos Enfoques, edited by Jorge G. Marcos, pp. 25–50. Corporación Editora Nacional, Quito.
  16. Marcos, Jorge G. and Presley Norton, 1981, Interpretación sobre la arqueología de la Isla de la Plata. Miscelánea Antropológica Ecuatoriana 1: 136–154.
  17. Masucci, Maria A., 1992, Ceramic Change in the Guangala Phase, Southwest Ecuador: A Typology and Chronology. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Anthropology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX.
  18. Masucci, Maria A., 2001, Defining ceramic change and cultural interaction: results of typological, chronological, and technological analyses of Guangala Phase ceramics. Andean Past 6: 175–208.
  19. Meggers, Betty J., 1966, Ecuador. Thames and Hudson, London.
  20. Norton, Presley, 1982, Cambio y Continuidad en Salango. Museo Arqueológico del Banco del Pacifico, Guayaquil.
  21. Norton, Presley, Richard Lunnis and Nigel Nayling, 1983, Excavaciones en Salango, provincia de Manabí, Ecuador. Miscelánea Antropológica Ecuatoriana 3:9–80.
  22. Rappaport, Joanne, 1990, Politics of Memory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  23. Saville, Marshall H., 1910, The Antiquities of Manabí, Ecuador: Final Report. The Heye Foundation, Contributions to South American Archaeology, 2. New York. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Schavelzón, Daniel, 1981, Arqueología y Arquitectura del Ecuador Prehispánica, edited by Francisco Valdez and Diego Veintimilla. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F.
  25. Stothert, Karen, 1984, A New Look at Guangala Society and Economy: A Discussion of the Origin and Development of Chiefdoms on the Santa Elena Peninsula, Ecuador. Paper presented in the Symposium on Cosmology and Social Structure in the Andes at the 49th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Portland, Oregon, April 11–14, 1984.
  26. Stothert, Karen, 1993, Un Sitio de Guangala Temprano en el Suroeste del Ecuador. National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. and Anthropology Museum, Central Bank of Ecuador, Guayaquil.
  27. Valdez, Francisco, 1986, Investigaciones arqueológicas en La Tolita (Esmeraldas, Ecuador). Miscelánea Antropológica Ecuatoriana 6:81–107.
  28. Valdez, Francisco, 1992, The Tolita ceramic tradition. In Amerindian Signs. 5, 000 Years of Precolumbian Art in Ecuador, edited by Francisco Valdez and Diego Veintimilla, pp. 135–140. Dinediciones, Quito, Ecuador.
  29. Valdez, Francisco and Diego Veintimilla (eds.), 1992, Amerindian Signs. 5, 000 Years of Precolumbian Art in Ecuador. Dinediciones, Quito, Ecuador.
  30. Whitten Jr., Norman E., 1975, Sacha Runa, Ethnicity and Adaptation of Ecuadorian Jungle Quichua. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
  31. Zeidler, James A., 2001, Central coast regional chiefdoms. In Encyclopedia of Prehistory. Volume 5: Middle America, edited by Peter N. Peregrine and Melvin Ember. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Masucci, M. A.
Venue
The Handbook of South American Archaeology
Published
2008
Pages
489-503
Cited by
10
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review