Cited by 8Archaeology and Cultural HeritageHistorical Studies in Central AmericaAmazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Regional archaeology in northern manabf, ecuador

Lippi, Ronald D., Zeidler, James A., Pearsall, Deborah M.·1996·The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3034103

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lippi, R. D., Zeidler, J. A., & Pearsall, D. M.
Venue
The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1996-06
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
355
ISSN
1359-0987 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2317484695
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies in Central America
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
Keywords
regional archaeology, archaeological site, pre-Columbian archaeology, Andean archaeology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review