The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Understanding Disability
Abstract
Understanding Disability develops some of the main themes and issues surrounding disability that have arisen in the last twenty years, offering both a personal journey of exploration and understanding
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Annual Research Review: Shifting from ‘normal science’ to neurodiversity in autism science
Pellicano, E., & den Houting, J. (2022) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13534 · Cited by 744
Neurodiversity: An insider’s perspective
den Houting, J. (2019) · Autism · doi:10.1177/1362361318820762 · Cited by 485
Disability in a Human Rights Context
Degener, T. (2016) · Laws · doi:10.3390/laws5030035 · Cited by 367
From Cure to Community: Transforming Notions of Autism
Bagatell, N. (2010) · Ethos · doi:10.1111/j.1548-1352.2009.01080.x · Cited by 327
Marks, D. (1997) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.3109/09638289709166831 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Oliver, M.
- Publisher
- Macmillan Education UK
- Published
- 1996
- OpenAlex
- W4229766796
- Cited by
- 1,818
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 56.60
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding Disability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-349-24269-6
- The paper
- Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding Disability. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24269-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
