Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Game Theory and The Law

Baird, Douglas G.·2002·The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law

Abstract

Game theory possesses a distinctive vocabulary that may at times accentuate the differences between it and traditional law-and-economics. If we take a few steps backwards, however, we are likely to see that the differences are ones of emphasis. Game theory is useful not because it is different from traditional law-and-economics, but because it provides additional tools to anyone interested in understanding the structure of legal rules and the way they affect the way people behave (see Ayres 1990). The easiest way to see this is to begin with the most familiar example in law-and-economics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_160

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 268

Metadata

Authors
Baird, D. G.
Venue
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law
Published
2002
Pages
850-856
OpenAlex
W1582280623
Cited by
268
References
18
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Game Theory and The Law. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_160
The paper
Baird, D. G. (2002). Game Theory and The Law. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_160

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.