The DOI matches its Crossref record.
First Floridians and Last Mastodons: The Page-Ladson Site in the Aucilla River
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A mastodon tusk recovered from Unit 3c during previous excavations in 1993 has multiple, parallel, deep, linear grooves running perpendicular to the long axis of the tusk.
“During the previous excavations in 1993, a mastodon tusk was recovered from Unit 3c, with multiple, parallel, deep, linear grooves running perpendicular to the long axis of the tusk (24).”
From Pre-Clovis occupation 14,550 years ago at the Page-Ladson site, Florida, and the peopling of the Americas (2016) · cites this paper as [24]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Halligan, J. J., Waters, M. R., Perrotti, A., Owens, I. J., Feinberg, J. M., Bourne, M. D., Fenerty, B., Winsborough, B., Carlson, D., Fisher, D. C., et al. (2016) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1600375 · Cited by 259
The Buttermilk Creek Complex and the origins of Clovis at the Debra L. Friedkin Site, Texas
Waters, M. R., Forman, S. L., Jennings, T. A., Nordt, L. C., Driese, S. G., Feinberg, J. M., Keene, J. L., Halligan, J., Lindquist, A., Pierson, J., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1201855 · Cited by 229
Early Human Settlement of Northeastern North America
Lothrop, J. C., Lowery, D. L., Spiess, A. E., & Ellis, C. J. (2016) · PaleoAmerica · doi:10.1080/20555563.2016.1212178 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 2006
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
