Cited by 7
The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Public Good Markets: The Possible Role of Hybrid Governance Structures in Institutions for Sustainability
Huylenbroeck, Guido Van, Vuylsteke, Anne, Verbeke, Wim·2009·Institutions and Sustainability
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4020-9690-7_9
Cites
Statistics
Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.
Verification
Claims the paper makes
We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The role of these two instruments is important because every market arena is embedded within a set of institutional structures that constrain and either incentivize or disincentivize the prosocial behavior of the actors within the arena (Huylenbroeck et al., 2009; Ostrom, 1998).”
From Win Together or Lose Alone: Circular Economy and Hybrid Governance for Natural Resource Commons (2024) · cites this paper as Huylenbroeck et al., 2009
In the citing paper
“Natural resource commons are part of the arena, and the institutions interfacing with them can influence their sustainability through the implementation of circular economy practices (Bulte and Ruben, 2023; Huylenbroeck et al., 2009).”
From Win Together or Lose Alone: Circular Economy and Hybrid Governance for Natural Resource Commons (2024) · cites this paper as Huylenbroeck et al., 2009
In the citing paper
“Institutions organize processes for the preservation of natural resource commons but bear transaction costs that are proportional to the complexity involved.”
From Win Together or Lose Alone: Circular Economy and Hybrid Governance for Natural Resource Commons (2024) · cites this paper as Huylenbroeck et al., 2009
In the citing paper
“These institutions manage transaction costs, uncertainty, coordination, and other relevant aspects in the formation and exchange of property rights, as well as the manner and efficiency with which production and consumption incentives are mobilized (Huylenbroeck et al., 2009; Menard, 1995; North, 1990).”
From Win Together or Lose Alone: Circular Economy and Hybrid Governance for Natural Resource Commons (2024) · cites this paper as Huylenbroeck et al., 2009
In the citing paper
“Note that these policies can be delegated to hybrid institutions, especially those with a hierarchy involving public authorities, even as supervisors, and thus can fall within the tools that hybrid organizations Leonardo Becchetti et al. can use for managing natural common goods (Huylenbroeck et al., 2009).”
From Win Together or Lose Alone: Circular Economy and Hybrid Governance for Natural Resource Commons (2024) · cites this paper as Huylenbroeck et al., 2009
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 47
- Alavalapati, J. R. R., & Mercer, D. E. (Eds.). (2004). Valuing agro-forestry systems. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Arndt, J. (1979). Toward a concept of domesticated markets. Journal of Marketing, 43, 69–75. · DOI
- Arrow, K. J. (1964). Control in large organizations. Management Science, 10, 397–408. · DOI
- Arrow, K. J. (1974). The limits of organizations. New York: Norton.
- Barnhill, J. A., & Lawson, W. M. (1980). Toward a theory of modern markets. European Journal of Marketing, 4, 50–60. · DOI
- Boger, S. (2001). Agriculture markets in transition: An empirical study of contracts and transaction costs in the Polish hog sector: Vol. 4. Institutional change in agriculture and natural resources. Aachen: Shaker.
- Callon, M. (1998). The laws of the markets. London: Blackwell Publishers.
- Davis, L. E., & North, D. C. (1971). Institutional change and American economic growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
- Ducros, G. (2007) Efficacitè et coûts de transaction des contrats agro-environnementaux. PhD thesis, University of Rennes.
- Fukuyama, F. (2002). Social capital and development: The coming agenda. SAIS Review, 22, 23–37. · DOI
- Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510. · DOI · Paper page
- Hagedorn, K. (2003). Rethinking the theory of agricultural change in an institution of sustainability perspective. In G. Van Huylenbroeck, W. Verbeke, L. Lauwers, I. Vanslembrouck, & M. Dhaese (Eds.). Importance of policies and institutions for agriculture (pp. 33–56). Gent: Academic Press.
- Hagedorn, K. (2005, October). The dichotomy of segregative and integrative institutions and its particular importance for sustainable resource use and rural development. Paper presented at the workshop in political theory and policy analysis colloquium Mini Series, Bloomington.
- Hagedorn, K., Arzt, A., & Peters, U. (2002). Institutional arrangements for environmental co-operatives: A conceptual framework. In K. Hagedorn (Ed.). Environmental cooperation and institutional change. Theories and policies for European agriculture (pp. 3–25). Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar. · DOI
- Herrera, P. A. (2005) Institutional economic assessment of the governance of irrigated agriculture: The case of the Peninsula of Santa Elena, Ecuador. PhD thesis, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Gent: Ghent University.
- Hodgson, G. M. (1999). Economics and utopia. London and New York: Routledge.
- Hurwicz, L. (1987). Inventing new institutions: The design perspective. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 69, 395–402. · DOI
- Kotler, P. (1997). Marketing management: Analysis, planning, implementation, and control. New Jersey: Pentice Hall.
- Kyeyamwa, H. (2007). Integration of smallholder cattle farmers in the livestock market of Uganda. PhD thesis, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering. Gent: Ghent University.
- Lindblom, C.E. (2001). The market system. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- McMillan, J. (2002). Reinventing the bazaar. New York: Norton
- Menard, C. (1995). Markets as institutions versus organizations as markets? Disentangling some fundamental concepts. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organisation, 28, 161–182. · DOI · Paper page
- Menard, C. (2004). The economics of hybrid organizations. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 160, 345–376. · DOI
- Menard, C. (2007, June). The governance of hybrid organizations. Paper presented at the Emnet conference on economics and management of networks, Rotterdam.
- Mittenzwei, K., & Bullock, D. (2004). Rules and equilibria: a formal conceptualization of institutions with an application to Nowegian agricultural policy making. In G. van Huylenbroeck, W. Verbeke & L. Lauwers (Eds.), The role of institutions in rural policies and agricultural markets (pp. 109–121). Amsterdam: Elsevier Press.
- North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press. · DOI · Paper page
- North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspective, 5, 97–112. · DOI
- North, D. C. (1994). Economic performance through time. American Economic Review, 84, 359–368.
- Ostrom, E. (1998). The institutional analysis and development approach. In E. Tusak-Loehman & D. Kulgur (Eds.), Designing institutions for environmental and resource management (pp. 68–90). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
- Ostrom, E. (1999a). Coping with the tragedies of the commons. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 493–535. · DOI
- Ostrom, E. (1999b). Institutional rational choice: an assessment of the IAD framework. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 35–72). Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
- Ostrom, E., Gardener, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games & common pool resources. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. · DOI
- Pindyck, R. S., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (1998). Microeconomics. Upper Saddle River: Printice-Hall Inc.
- Platteau, J. P. (2000). Institutions, social norms, and economic development. Amsteldijk: Harwood Academic Publishers.
- Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither markets nor hierarchies. Network forms of organisations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cunnings (Eds.), Research in organisational behaviour. Greenwich, Connecticut: Jai Press Inc.
- Rangan, S., Samii, R., & Van Wassenhove, L. (2006). Constructive partnerships: when alliances between private firms and public actors can enable creative strategies. Academy of Management Review, 31, 738–751. · DOI
- Slangen, L. H. G., & Polman, N. B. P. (2002). Environmental co-operatives: a new institutional arrangement of farmers. In K. Hagedorn. (Ed.), Environmental co-operation and institutional change. Theories and policies for European agriculture (pp. 69–90). Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar. · DOI
- Stigler, G. (1967). Imperfection in the capital market. Journal of Political Economy, 75, 287–292. · DOI
- Swedberg, R. (1994). Markets as social structures. In R. Swedberg & N. J. Smelser. (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology (pp. 255–282). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2003). Hybrid governance structures to respond to new consumer and citizens’ concerns about food. In G. Van Huylenbroeck, W. Verbeke, L. Lauwers, I. Vanslembrouck, & M. Dhaese (Eds.), Importance of policies and institutions for agriculture (pp. 191–206). Gent: Academic Press.
- Van Huylenbroeck, G., & Espinel, R. L. (2007). Importance of institutions and governance structures for market access and protection of property rights of small farmers in developing countries. In E. Bulte & R. Ruben (Eds.), Development economics between markets and institutions: Incentives for growth, food security and sustainable use of the environment (pp. 327–344). Wageningen: Academic Publishers.
- Verhaegen, I., & Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2002). Hybrid governance structures for quality farm products. A transaction cost perspective: Vol. 6. Institutional change in agriculture and natural resources. Aachen: Shaker.
- Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York, NY: Free Press.
- Williamson, O. E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Adninistrative Science Quarterly, 36, 269–296. · DOI · Paper page
- Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38, 595–613. · DOI
- Williamson, O. E. (2004). Transaction cost economics and agriculture: An excursion. In G. van Huylenbroeck, W. Verbeke & L. Lauwers (Eds.), The role of institutions in rural policies and agricultural markets (pp. 19–39). Amsterdam: Elsevier Press.
- World Bank. (2003). World development report 2003: Building institutions for markets. New York: Oxford University Press for the World Bank.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Win Together or Lose Alone: Circular Economy and Hybrid Governance for Natural Resource Commons
Becchetti, L., Bova, D. M., & Raffaele, L. (2024) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4880178 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Huylenbroeck, G. V., Vuylsteke, A., & Verbeke, W.
- Venue
- Institutions and Sustainability
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 2009
- Pages
- 175-191
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
