The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Erratum: International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Teachers often lack the capacity and competencies to provide individualized SRL support for all students in real time.
“Teachers often lack the capacity and competencies to provide individualized SRL support for all students in real time, as such support would require ongoing assessments of students' motivational states, cognitive resources, and strategy use, as well as the use of these assessments for the selection of appropriate learning tasks and support measures (Azevedo & Aleven, 2013 ; Fütterer et”
From Enhancing School Students' Self-Regulated Learning through Generative AI Support: A Randomized Controlled Trial (2026) · cites this paper as Azevedo & Aleven, 2013
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Azevedo, R., Landis, R. S., Feyzi-Behnagh, R., Duffy, M., Trevors, G., Harley, J. M., Bouchet, F., Burlison, J., Taub, M., Pacampara, N., et al. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30950-2_27 · Cited by 58
Self-citationFütterer, T., Bardach, L., Kuhn, J., Keller, S. D., & Gerjets, P. (2026) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-026-10133-8 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Azevedo, R., & Aleven, V.
- Affiliations
- McGill University (CA)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Venue
- Springer International Handbooks of Education
- Publisher
- Springer New York
- Published
- 2013
- Pages
- E1-E1
- ISSN
- 2197-1951 (ISSN-L)
- 2197-196X
- OpenAlex
- W2179703960
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Springer international handbooks of education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Technology in Learning
- Keywords
- metacognition, educational technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
