CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 66

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Technology and the Challenge of Aging

Sixsmith, Andrew·2013·Technologies for Active Aging
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-8348-0_2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4419-8348-0_2

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Avgerou, C., & McGrath, K. (2007). Power, rationality, and the art of living through socio-­technical change. MIS Quarterly, 31(2), 295–315. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Beringer, R., Sixsmith, A., Campo, M., Brown, J., & McCloskey, R. (2011). The “acceptance” of ambient assisted living: Developing an alternative methodology to this limited research lens. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Proceedings from the 9th International Conference on Smart Homes and Health Telematics LCNS 6719–ICOST 2011. Berlin: Springer. · DOI
  3. Bhachu, A., Hine, N., & Woolrych, R. (2012). The role of assistive technology in supporting ­formal carers. In J. Augusto et al. (Eds.), Handbook of ambient assisted living (pp. 283–303). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  4. Biggs, S., Hendricks, J., & Lowenstein, A. (2003). The need for theory in gerontology. Introduction. In S. Biggs, A. Lowenstein, & J. Hendricks (Eds.), The need for theory: Critical approaches to social gerontology (pp. 1–12). New York: Baywood.
  5. Birren, J. E., & Bengtson, V. L. (1988). International perspectives on families, aging and social support. New York: Springer.
  6. Bowles, K. H., & Baugh, A. C. (2007). Applying research evidence to optimize telehomecare. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 22, 5–15. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Celler, B. G., Earnshaw, W., Ilsar, E. D., Betbedermatibet, L., Harris, M. F., Clark, R., et al. (1995). Remote monitoring of health status of the elderly at home. A multidisciplinary project on aging at the University of New South Wales. International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing, 40(2), 147–155. · DOI
  8. Cooperrider, D., & Whitney, D. (2005). Appreciative inquiry: A positive revolution in change. San Francisco, CA: Case Western Berrett-Koehler.
  9. Csíkszentmihályi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Perennia.
  10. Davidoff, S., Lee, K., Yiu, C., Dey, A., & Zimmerman, J. (2006). Principles of smart home control. In P. Dourish & A. Friday (Eds.), Ubicomp (Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences, Vol. 4206, pp. 19–34). Berlin: Springer. · DOI
  11. Davidson, M. C., & Santorelli, J. M. (2008). Network effects: An introduction to broadband ­technology & regulation. Washington, DC: U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
  12. Eisma, R., Dickinson, A., Goodman, J., Syme, A., Tiwari, L., & Newell, A. F. (2004). Early user involvement in the development of Information Technology-related products for older people. Universal Access in the Information Society, 3(2), 131–140. · DOI
  13. Federal Interagency Forum on Aging. (2004). Older Americans 2004. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
  14. Floeck, M., Litz, L., & Spellerberg, A. (2012). Monitoring patterns of inactivity in the home with domotics networks. In Handbook of ambient assisted living (pp. 258–282). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  15. Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish (2nd ed.). New York: Vintage Books.
  16. Freeman, J., & Lessiter, J. (2001). ITC-UsE Ease of Use and Knowledge of Digital and Interactive Television: Results. Independent Television Commission: http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/archive/itc/uploads/UsE_report.pdf.
  17. Fudge, N., Wolfe, C. D. A., & McKevitt, C. (2007). Involving older people in health research. Age and Ageing, 36, 492–500. · DOI
  18. Gee, E. M., & Gutman, G. M. (2000). The overselling of population aging: Apocalyptic demography, intergenerational challenges, and social policy. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.
  19. Guo, B., Zhang, D., & Imai, M. (2010). Enabling user-oriented management for ubiquitous ­computing. Journal of Computer Networks, 54(16), 2840–2855. · DOI
  20. Hwang, M.-Y., Hong, J.-C., Hao, Y.-W., & Jong, J.-T. (2011). Elders’ usability, dependability, and flow experiences on embodied interactive video games. Educational Gerontology, 37(8), 715–731. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Kearns, W., Nams, V., & Fozard, J. (2010). Wireless fractal estimation of tortuosity in movement paths related to cognitive impairment in assisted living facility residents. Methods of Information in Medicine, 49(6), 592–598. · DOI
  22. Korupp, S. E., & Szydlik, M. (2005). Causes and trends of the digital divide. European Sociological Review, 21(4), 409–422. · DOI
  23. Lawton, M. P., & Nahemow, L. (1973). Ecology and the aging process. In C. Eisdorfer & M. P. Lawton (Eds.), Psychology of adult development and aging (pp. 657–668). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  24. Lloyd-Sherlock, P., McKee, M., Ebrahim, S., Gorman, M., Greengross, S., Prince, M., et al. (2012). Population ageing and health. The Lancet, 379(9823), 1295–1296. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60519-4. · DOI
  25. Luis, C. A., Loewenstein, D. A., Acevedo, A., Barker, W. W., & Duara, R. (2003). Mild cognitive impairment: directions for future research. Neurology, 61, 438–444. · DOI
  26. Marin, S., & Mulvenna, M. (2012). Delivering technology-enriched health and social care: Policy context for user-focused research. In J. Augusto et al. (Eds.), Handbook on AAL for healthcare, well-being and rehabilitation (pp. 369–386). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  27. McCreadie, C., & Tinker, A. (2005). The acceptability of assistive technology to older people. Ageing and Society, 25, 91–110. · DOI
  28. McGill, I., & Beaty, L. (2001). Action learning: A guide for professional management and educational development. London: Routledge.
  29. McLean, R., & Blackie, N. M. (2004). Customer and company voices in e-Commerce: A qualitative analysis. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 7(24), 243–249. · DOI
  30. Meyer, I., Muller, S., & Kubitschke, L. (2012). AAL markets: Knowing them, researching them. Evidence from European Research. In J. Augusto et al. (Eds.), Handbook on AAL for healthcare, well-being and rehabilitation (pp. 346–368). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  31. Mihailidis, A., Boger, J., Czarnuch, S., Jiancaro, T., & Hoey, J. (2012). Ambient assisted living technology to support older adults with dementia with activities of daily living. In J. Augusto et al. (Eds.), Handbook of ambient assisted living (pp. 304–330). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  32. Miskelly, F. (2001). Assistive technology in elderly care. Age and Ageing, 30, 455–458. · DOI
  33. Müller, S., & Sixsmith, A. (2008). User requirements for ambient assisted living: Results of the SOPRANO project. Gerontechnology, 7(2), 168. · DOI
  34. Namazi, S., Sixsmith, A., Glaesser, U., & O’Rourke, N. (2012, June). Developing a mobile experience sampling tool for seniors with bipolar disorder. Paper presented at the World Conference of the International Society of Gerontechnology, Eindhoven. · DOI
  35. Pare, G., Jaana, M., & Sicotte, C. (2007). Systematic review of home telemonitoring for chronic diseases: The evidence base. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 14, 269–277. · DOI · Paper page
  36. Piau, A., Nourhashémi, F., Hein, C., Caillaud, C., & Vellas, B. (2011). Progress in the development of new drugs in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging, 15(1), 45–57. · DOI · Paper page
  37. Rubin, J. (1994). Handbook of usability testing. New York: Wiley.
  38. Sauvé, L., & Kaufman, D. (Eds.) (2010). Jeux et simulations éducatifs: Etudes de cas et leçons apprises [Educational games and simulations: Case studies and lessons learned]. Saint-Foi, Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec. · DOI
  39. Schmid, I., Marks, B., Sixsmith, A., Jung, K., Baines, S., & Carson, J. (2012). Music player for dementia care homes. Gerontechnology, 11(2), 419.
  40. Sixsmith, A. (2006). New technologies to support independent living and quality of life for people with dementia. Alzheimer’s Care Quarterly, 7(3), 194–202.
  41. Sixsmith, A. (2011). A user-driven approach to developing ambient assisted living systems for older people. In J. Soar, R. Swindell, & P. Tsang (Eds.), Intelligent technologies for bridging the grey divide (pp. 30–45). New York: Information Science. · DOI · Paper page
  42. Sixsmith, A. (2012). International initiatives on development of information and communication technologies to assist older people. Gerontechnology, 11(2). · DOI
  43. Sixsmith, A., & Johnson, N. (2004). A smart sensor to detect falls of the elderly. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 3(2), 42–47. · DOI
  44. Sixsmith, A., Orpwood, R., & Torrington, J. (2010). Developing a music player for people with dementia. Gerontechnology, 9(3), 421–427. · DOI
  45. Sixsmith, A., & Sixsmith, J. (2000). Smart home technologies: meeting whose needs? Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 6(1) Supplement, 190–192. · DOI
  46. Sixsmith, A., & Sixsmith, J. (2008). Ageing in place in the United Kingdom. Ageing International, 32(3), 219–235. · DOI
  47. Steen, M., Kuijt-Evers, L., & Klok, J. (2007). Early user involvement in research and design ­projects – a review of methods and practices. Paper for the 23rd EGOS Colloquium (European Group for Organizational Studies).
  48. Townsend, P. (1986). Ageism and social policy. In C. Phillipson & A. Walker (Eds.), Ageing and social policy: A critical assessment (pp. 15–44). Aldershot, Hampshire: Gower.
  49. Townsend, P. (2006). Policies for the aged in the 21st century: More ‘structured dependency’ or the realisation of human rights? Ageing and Society, 26, 161–179. · DOI
  50. van den Hove, S. (2006). Between consensus and compromise: acknowledging the negotiation dimension in participatory approaches. Land Use Policy, 23, 10–17. · DOI
  51. Wickson, F., Carew, A. L., & Russell, A. W. (2006). Transdisciplinary research: Characteristics, quandaries and quality. Futures, 38(9), 1046–1059. · DOI · Paper page
  52. Wiles, J. L., Leibing, A., Guberman, N., Reeve, J., & Allen, R. E. S. (2011). The meaning of “aging in place” to older people. The Gerontologist. doi:10.1093/geront/gnr098. · DOI
  53. Wister, A., Sixsmith, A., Adams, R., & Sinden, D. (2009). Fact book on aging in British Columbia (5th ed.). Vancouver, BC: Gerontology Research Centre, Simon Fraser University.
  54. Woolrych, R., & Sixsmith, A. (2012). Challenges of user-centred research in the development of ambient assisted living systems. In M. Donnelly, C. Paggetti, C. Nugent, & M. Mokhtari (Eds.), Impact analysis of solutions for chronic disease prevention and management (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7251, pp. 1–8). Berlin: Springer. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 66

Metadata

Authors
Sixsmith, A.
Venue
Technologies for Active Aging
Publisher
Springer US
Published
2013
Pages
7-25
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4419-8348-0_2
Cited by
66
References
2
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Technology and the Challenge of Aging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-4419-8348-0_2
The paper
Sixsmith, A. (2013). Technology and the Challenge of Aging. Technologies for Active Aging. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8348-0_2