Cited by 362Interdisciplinary Research and CollaborationUrban Planning and GovernanceCross-Border Cooperation and Integration

Transdisciplinarity and its challenges: the case of urban studies

Ramadier, Thierry·2004·Futures

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.009

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramadier, T.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Ramadier, Thierry
Venue
Futures
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-05
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
423-439
ISSN
0016-3287 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023271168
Cited by
362
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 30
FWCI
21.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Futures (publishedVersion)
  • Evaluation in Progress - Strategies for Environmental Research and Implementation (IAPS 18 Conference Proceedings on CD-Rom)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Planning and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Cross-Border Cooperation and Integration
Keywords
transdisciplinarity, urban studies, multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinary research, urban representation, urban perception, suburbs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review