Cited by 273Social and Intergroup PsychologySocial Power and Status DynamicsDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Delegitimization: The Extreme Case of Stereotyping and Prejudice

Bar-Tal, Daniel·1989·Stereotyping and Prejudice

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4612-3582-8_8

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Theory suggests that acting beyond societal norms leads to moral exclusion, and outgroups allegedly operate beyond moral rules and values.

    “Theory has suggested that acting beyond societal norms leads to moral exclusion (Bar-Tal, 1989), and out- groups allegedly operate beyond moral rules and values (Opotow, 1990; Staub, 1989).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bar-Tal, D.
Venue
Stereotyping and Prejudice
Published
1989
Pages
169-182
OpenAlex
W116240176
Cited by
273
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 17
FWCI
9.99
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
delegitimization, stereotypes, prejudice, intergroup relations, social representations, intergroup behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review