Cited by 67Nursing care and researchResilience and Mental HealthIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving

Caring Relationships: How to Promote Resilience in Challenging Times

Windle, Gill, Bennett, Kate M.·2012·The Social Ecology of Resilience

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4614-0586-3_18

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Windle, G., & Bennett, K. M.
Affiliations
  • Bangor University (GB)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Windle, Gill
Venue
The Social Ecology of Resilience
Published
2011-09-03
Pages
219-231
OpenAlex
W1602147245
Cited by
66
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.08
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Keywords
resilience, care relationships, caregiver burden, family caregiving, life course, complex care needs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review