Cited by 27Resilience and Mental HealthAging, Health, and DisabilityAging and Gerontology Research

The Influence of Life Experiences on the Development of Resilience in Older People With Co-morbid Health Problems

Open access
Windle, Gill, Bennett, Kate M., MacLeod, Catherine, The CFAS WALES research team·2020·Frontiers in Medicine

Abstract

Background: Co-morbidity is a major late-life challenge with poor outcomes, yet many older people are resilient. We consider an ecopsychosocial framework of resilience to investigate this disparity. This theorises that sources of resilience may be personal, social and structural. We explored older people’s responses and reactions to significant life experiences, to understand resilience development for managing later life health challenges. Methods: We applied a two-stage, cross-sectional mixed-methods design to the Cognitive Function and Ageing Studies Wales (CFAS Wales). Participants’ defined quantitatively as resilient (high level of well-being despite co-morbidity) were identified in the wave 1 dataset. A sub-sample of the resilient participants aged 65+ were randomly selected for semi-structured interviews (N=20). Qualitative thematic analyses were both inductive and deductive. Results: The analyses revealed four primary life experiences reflecting different developmental trajectories. ‘Early years as formative’ and ‘work and employment as formative’ occurred at normative developmental stages in the life-course. In contrast non-normative life events such as loss, bereavement, illness of self and others underpinned the themes of ‘adverse events and experiences’ and ‘caring experiences’. Four potential mechanisms for resilience were central to these life experiences, reflecting reactions, actions and development: ‘character and self-identity’; ‘approach to life and insight’; ‘meaningful relationships and belonging’. Conclusions: This work contributes further theoretical insights into the ecopsychosocial resilience framework. It highlights the process of interdependence between the individual and the wider environment, suggesting how the availability and accessibility of resources and human agency (protective factors), can influence, and be influenced by, the timing of significant events and experiences. In doing so, it corroborates international healthy ageing policy which recognises resilience as important for a public health response to support older people to adjust to changes and losses experienced in later life. It highlights the importance of current and future policies and services for supporting the management of adverse events earlier in the life-course, and recommends that policies and services take a ‘long view’ on population health and well-being and consider the whole life-course, in addition to specific points in the ageing process.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmed.2020.502314

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ecological model of resilience has been used in contexts such as older people living in poverty in Colombia, widowhood, chronic health conditions, end-of-life care, and dementia care.

    “Windle and Bennett [21] developed the ecological model of resilience (Fig 1) which was originally developed in relationship to caregiving but has subsequently been used in other contexts, for example amongst older people living in poverty in Colombia [17], widowhood [10], chronic health conditions [22], and caregiving in relationship to end of life care [23] and dementia care [15].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Windle, G., Bennett, K. M., MacLeod, C., & The CFAS WALES research team
Affiliations
  • Bangor University (GB)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Windle, Gill
Venue
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2020-09-22
Volume
7
Pages
502314-502314
ISSN
2296-858X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3088751414
Cited by
27
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Bangor University Research Portal (Bangor University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
resilience, older adults, comorbidities, life experience, well-being, bereavement, loss, illness, caring experience, self-identity, meaningful relationships, sense of belonging, life course, healthy aging, protective factors, human agency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review