Cited by 136Autophagy in Disease and TherapyRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsRetinal Development and Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Autophagy in the Retina: A Potential Role in Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Open access

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4614-0631-0_12

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Boulton ME (2009) Lipofuscin of the RPE. In: Fundus Autofluorescence (Lois M, Forrester J, eds), pp 14–26 Philadelphia: Lipincott; Williams and Wilkins

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 136

Metadata

Authors
Mitter, S. K., Rao, H. V., Qi, X., Cai, J., Sugrue, A., Dunn, W. A., Grant, M. B., & Boulton, M. E.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Boulton, Michael E.
Venue
Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology
Publisher
Springer US
Published
2011-11-11
Volume
723
Pages
83-90
ISSN
0065-2598 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1482184907
Cited by
136
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
43.28
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in experimental medicine and biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • American Health Assistance Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY019688, EY019688)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK090730)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Development and Disorders
Keywords
autophagy, age-related macular degeneration, retina, retinal degeneration, oxidative stress, aging, mitochondrial damage, lipofuscin accumulation, retinal pigment epithelium, autophagic flux
MeSH terms
Animals, Autophagy, Humans, Macular Degeneration, Mitochondria, Retina, Oxidative Stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review